fernandez32112
New member
idle die
SO after taking the car to the dealer and being told by the mitsu mechanic that he had no idea what was causing the problem and offering to change the throttle body art a cost of $900, i decided to tackle it my self. I connected my autolink computer to the car to read the live data. the live data told me that the engine rpm was low 550-700 with the a/c on or off while in drive.. the throttle position sensor was reading 2.4 at idle and eratic between 2.5 and 7.1 just before the the car would turn off(in drive, ac on full). I DISCONNECTED THE MASS AIR FLOW SENSOR and read the live data again. Here is what happened:
With the car in idle, in drive and ac full speed
1. the car did not turn off
2. the check engine light turned on-MAF codes only
3. the throttle position sensor read steady at 4.5
4. the engine rpm steady at 875
I repeated this 6 times, 3 times with the MAF connected and 3 times with the MAF disconnected. The result were the same- bad with the MAF connected and good with the MAF disconnected.
I was hoping you would do the same test on your car to see if your results are similair to mine. Im convinced the MAF is bad. I'd like to know your thoughts
SO after taking the car to the dealer and being told by the mitsu mechanic that he had no idea what was causing the problem and offering to change the throttle body art a cost of $900, i decided to tackle it my self. I connected my autolink computer to the car to read the live data. the live data told me that the engine rpm was low 550-700 with the a/c on or off while in drive.. the throttle position sensor was reading 2.4 at idle and eratic between 2.5 and 7.1 just before the the car would turn off(in drive, ac on full). I DISCONNECTED THE MASS AIR FLOW SENSOR and read the live data again. Here is what happened:
With the car in idle, in drive and ac full speed
1. the car did not turn off
2. the check engine light turned on-MAF codes only
3. the throttle position sensor read steady at 4.5
4. the engine rpm steady at 875
I repeated this 6 times, 3 times with the MAF connected and 3 times with the MAF disconnected. The result were the same- bad with the MAF connected and good with the MAF disconnected.
I was hoping you would do the same test on your car to see if your results are similair to mine. Im convinced the MAF is bad. I'd like to know your thoughts