Adventurous
Explorer
4.88's, no question. Consider the fact that, in addition to tires, you've added a lot of weight to the vehicle. Then, compare the final drive ratios of the manual vs. the automatic - I think you'll find that you're final drive ratio is much lower (numerically) than that of a manual.
I just put 4.88's in my 04... bumpers, topper, skids, etc... 285/75-16 General AT2's in load range D. HUGE improvement. Sure, cruising RPMS went up 18%... but at 70mph, that puts me at 2600 rpms. Now it can pull a slight incline w/o shifting.
In hindsight? I may have done 5.29's. Seriously.
EDIT: did some searching.....
6th gear - manual - OD is .85:1
5th gear - automatic - OD is .71.:1
So you could drop gear ratios almost 20% and still be in the same cruising RPM as the manual with stock tires...
Considering no opinion I've solicited has been anything other than 4.88, sounds like that's the only way to go!
I also agree with 4.88. And why stop, just get the front ARB and be done with it. And if you do that, isnt the ECGS bushing no longer needed? I also plan to do the sport rotors and yellow pads soon. I think the TRD sport braking sucks as is. Heard the TRD offroad brakes are WAY more grippy under heavy braking. Good to hear you are still liking the setup.
You are right, the bushing is no longer needed if you do the ARB. I can just see the look on my wife's face now, "But honey, I actually saved money! By going with the $900 ARB locker I didn't have to buy the $45 bushing!" Maybe this one will be one of those purchases made on the down low... :snorkel:
These trucks should have came with the 4:88's from the factory! The truck is soooo much more enjoyable to drive after the gear upgrade, I installed the Nitro 4:88's with REM polish. No more huge boggy spot in the throttle and the gear hunting is gone. I went with the front ARB locker so as mentioned above no ECGS bushing needed. I did buy the bushing and tool before changing my mind and installing the ARB, they are available for sale if anyone needs them.
Hodakaguy
Funny, I have the ECGS bushing sitting in my toolbox as well. I was thinking I would stick with stock gears and all, but it's just such a dog with them I'm not sure I can. Not to mention I've literally run out of power before trying to back up, so perhaps I should be viewing a gear change less as a modification and more as a long term investment in the well-being of something I'll be keeping for the foreseeable future.
Hey Tim, there is a site here http://grimmjeeper.com/gears.html that has a nice handy dandy gear ratio calculator. You input your transmission model, transfer case ratios, final drive ratio, and tire size. It will tell you your rpms at a given speed, or you can put in speed and get rpms. Once you know your rpms for your gearing and tire size, you can simulate the gearing by putting it in fourth and driving at those rpms on the highway. You'll get a feel for engine noise & vibes, and I think some of the scan gauges might give you instant fuel economy.
From my experience, if you are running 33" or bigger and towing, you'll want 4.88. I don't tow, so the 4.56 work for me, as I don't want the additional highway rpm. The best mpg I get is about 15.5 in the mountains at 65-70 mph. I should be able to do better on flat land, but going 75 ish keeps it at 15.5. Highway rpms are the only downside to gearing. They are great around town and off road.
How are you liking the Kings?
If I could afford to have more thumbs surgically attached, for the sole purpose of being able to give the Kings more thumbs up, I would. Much like the move from OME to ICON showed how much the OMEs struggled to keep up, the move from ICON to King has showed how much the ICONs couldn't hang. I can definitely feel it as well as I still have ICONs in the back, they don't provide the same ride quality that I've come to expect from the front.
Of course, this is all based on my opinion that progressive valving is superior to digressive, but there are probably some people who feel opposite.