Twenty-niner
New member
We know quality when we see it, is all. :jump:
This is why this thread is so interesting. Since the early days of bicycle touring, the typical set up has been a steel frame decorated with 75 pounds of panniers. Here in the US we're seeing more variations on the bike as well as what falls under the header "bicycle touring."Godlykepower said:I find this thread quite interesting. In the States, do you call an 'adventure bike' anything that can go off road???
Most people seem to be going on about aluminium frames & either front or full sus. In the UK we would not even begin to consider anything made from anything other than steel for a 'real' adventure bike. Suspension is a no-go too, as a 'real' adventure bike needs to be able to have room for a million heavy duty panniers.
Sorry if I come across as being funny, but I do find it interesting how we differ on what constitutes an expedition bike.
For what its worth, before commiting to drive across Africa in my Land Rover....for many years I was going to ride it. My tool of choice? A custom build from Thorn....probably the best expedition bikes in the world.
www.thorncycles.co.uk
Martin
I dunno, I think the Thorn Exxp might be a fine singletrack tourer. But it really does depend on the intended trail. Some day I will get the time to ride the whole Colorado Trail at once and it'll be on the same bike that I ride sections with right now, the Blur. I really do honestly believe that the right bike is the one you are comfortable with, just like trucks. The right overland vehicle is the one that can get you out of the house.Flounder said:A loaded traditional touring bike is a thing of beauty as long as you don't mind sticking to roads. For the growing number of riders wanting to tour off-road, a Thorn just won't do.
I forgot about the Thorn Exxp. I was thinking more along the lines of the more traditional Thorn touring rigs. I agree with you that any bike paired with the right rider and route can be the ideal set up.DaveInDenver said:I dunno, I think the Thorn Exxp might be a fine singletrack tourer. But it really does depend on the intended trail. Some day I will get the time to ride the whole Colorado Trail at once and it'll be on the same bike that I ride sections with right now, the Blur. I really do honestly believe that the right bike is the one you are comfortable with, just like trucks. The right overland vehicle is the one that can get you out of the house.
I dunno if what Chris is doing is touring, rather insanity. ;-)Flounder said:Who would have thought that a carbon fiber Orbea mountain bike would be considered a "touring" bike?!?! RiverFever is out shredding that set up right now!
Flounder said:This is why this thread is so interesting. Since the early days of bicycle touring, the typical set up has been a steel frame decorated with 75 pounds of panniers. Here in the US we're seeing more variations on the bike as well as what falls under the header "bicycle touring."
A loaded traditional touring bike is a thing of beauty as long as you don't mind sticking to roads. For the growing number of riders wanting to tour off-road, a Thorn just won't do.
So, it depends what experience you're after. If you're after 100 days of open road the Thorn is the ticket. For 5-10 days of continuous singletrack then the options open up.
I'd like to offer my professional services to you, Andrea. I'm a professional bike breaker-inner. I'll even waive my fee and break your bike in free of charge. How does a couple months sound?dieselcruiserhead said:My Lenz came in yesterday, work of beauty. ]
Twenty-niner said:Even the most domesticated and subjugated among us can eek out a 3-day weekend from wives and work, do nothing but ride for 3 days straight... and voila! Instant adventurer! :088: