DiploStrat
Expedition Leader
Details, details!
7m long x 2.13m wide x 3m high - give or take a tiny bit. the length is bumper to bumper; shipping dimension. The width does not count the mirrors. The height is to the highest solar panel, not flex antenna.
The A arm replacement plus adjustment of the torsion bar keys gets more free wheel travel, especially in compression. Reduces bottoming. I know this works. If you look under the Isuzu/Chevrolet independent front suspension you will see that the A arms often rest directly on the compression bumpers. With the lift I have 2.5 cm of free travel. The steering stuff is claimed to reduce tire wear - can't prove it. See video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoCTj3BO5wM
I have had Bilstein shocks fail in six months; Ranchos in two years - I always go for the biggest and baddest I can fit. With as much as the Tiger weighs, I want as much shock as I can find.
OOOPS! My feet got tied up in meters. You are correct.
No change to the steering that I can notice. Never bothered to change the front anti-sway bar. By definition, an anti-sway bar should reduce total articulation. As a practical matter, for rough road travel, as opposed to rock crawling, the ride is much, much better due to reduced low speed sway. Again, I am designing for sustained travel on third world roads with minimum damage to the vehicle due to suspension bottoming or washboard vibration. The Tiger is much to big and heavy to be a rock crawler.
Hope this is helpful.
...
Very nice truck you have there. Thank you very much for sharing your experiences. Field experiences on nearly the same vehicle...that ist very helpfull. Can you tell me the dimensions of your truck?
7m long x 2.13m wide x 3m high - give or take a tiny bit. the length is bumper to bumper; shipping dimension. The width does not count the mirrors. The height is to the highest solar panel, not flex antenna.
-What improvements do you get from the A arm and pittman arm support?
The A arm replacement plus adjustment of the torsion bar keys gets more free wheel travel, especially in compression. Reduces bottoming. I know this works. If you look under the Isuzu/Chevrolet independent front suspension you will see that the A arms often rest directly on the compression bumpers. With the lift I have 2.5 cm of free travel. The steering stuff is claimed to reduce tire wear - can't prove it. See video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoCTj3BO5wM
-Adjustable Fox shocks: Would you go for the 2.0" or the 2.5" ones? Any idea what benefits the 2.5" compared to the 2" shocks would provide (for normal driving like we do, not racing)?
I have had Bilstein shocks fail in six months; Ranchos in two years - I always go for the biggest and baddest I can fit. With as much as the Tiger weighs, I want as much shock as I can find.
-900 kg rating for your tires...I think that is a bit low...should that maybe be 1900kg?
OOOPS! My feet got tied up in meters. You are correct.
-Any changes regarding oversteering or understeering after you added the rear sway bar? Did you change anything to the front sway bar? Can you tell me something about how much the max possible flexing has been reduced after you added the rear sway bar?
No change to the steering that I can notice. Never bothered to change the front anti-sway bar. By definition, an anti-sway bar should reduce total articulation. As a practical matter, for rough road travel, as opposed to rock crawling, the ride is much, much better due to reduced low speed sway. Again, I am designing for sustained travel on third world roads with minimum damage to the vehicle due to suspension bottoming or washboard vibration. The Tiger is much to big and heavy to be a rock crawler.
Hope this is helpful.