Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread: On trail comms; Why and how survey

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,868
    FRS radios can not have or use a removable antenna. This limits gain. That makes it a deal breaker for operations in all other radios.
    "Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-mechanic from Mad Max-
    If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
    - BLT Offroad KE7CSK

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    179
    I'm going to start by saying: this is not specifically related to answering the original question of the thread. I would move this conversation to PM's but I feel there's inaccuracies that need to be corrected publicly. Apologies for the thread-jacking, I hope it will be informative to someone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    Have you ever exceeded the speed limit? If so, your "moral high ground" is crumbling.
    I absolutely have. Guilty as charged. What I haven't done is promoted that practice to student drivers. My issue isn't entirely with the practice as it is with the promotion of it. This is also a much more technical conversation than "do you speed", so the false equivalency is, in my opinion, what's crumbling. You want to say that since I speed I can't say murder is wrong? They're both illegal, and I'm doing one of them, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    The FCC authorizes non licensed transmission in case of emergency--I have the capabilities that I have so that I have a tested, proven method to communicate if needed. I'd hate to be trying to modify my radio while an emergency situation is unfolding...
    Do you really think CB, GMRS or FRS are going to do you a lick of good in an emergency situation? You surely know HF is going to be far more effective. So clearly you're not just hacking your radio for emergency use, it's convenience pure and simple.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    That said, I do not make a regular practice of transmitting on bands that I am not supposed to--the cardinal rule for radio operation is to cause no interference to other users--I strictly abide by that rule.
    So here's my question: how do you know you're not interfering? If you're reaching out much further than either FRS or GMRS was ever intended to reach - which you almost definitely are - those you're interfering with won't be able to let you know on their legal radios.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    Now, the ability to communicate with CB, FRS, or GMRS radios is something I find quite useful...
    So now you're directly contradicting yourself: implying you'd only use it for emergencies, and now saying you find it useful... meaning you use it... which one is it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    ... but like anything else, has to be carefully evaluated. For instance, having solid communication going through a technical section of a trail has saved many lives--if there is a viable option to accomplish this with a group of people with mixed radio capabilities, I see that as something that I SHOULD do. On the other hand, we were at Uwharrie a couple months ago and there were CBs and Hams in the group. I chose to manually relay communication in the group as CBs don't have PL tones to keep out unwanted traffic and there are enough random transmissions out there that I would have almost certainly retransmitted a signal that came from outside our group.
    Yeah, having radios to spot people is fantastic, it is so much more clear than screaming and waving your arms. I carry an HT specifically for this. You can do the same with FRS/GMRS and CBs. And manually relaying traffic if people don't have matching gear is the right thing to do. Does it suck. Yeah. Get everyone on the same page. If you can't, work it out like you did. BTW, I'm glad you brought up the statute you did below, because it is directly talking about this: transmitting communications from other parties, such as stations on CB or FRS or GMRS.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    As far as linking CBs and FRS/GMRS transmissions to the HAM bands, I reference the below FCC rules on third party traffic:

    § 97.115 Third party communications.
    (a) An amateur station may transmit messages for a third party to:
    (1) Any station within the jurisdiction of the United States.
    (2) Any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government when transmitting emergency or disaster relief communications and any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government whose administration has made arrangements with the United States to allow amateur stations to be used for transmitting international communications on behalf of third parties. No station shall transmit messages for a third party to any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government whose administration has not made such an arrangement. This prohibition does not apply to a message for any third party who is eligible to be a control operator of the station.
    (b) The third party may participate in stating the message where:
    (1) The control operator is present at the control point and is continuously monitoring and supervising the third party's participation; and
    (2) The third party is not a prior amateur service licensee whose license was revoked or not renewed after hearing and re-licensing has not taken place; suspended for less than the balance of the license term and the suspension is still in effect; suspended for the balance of the license term and re-licensing has not taken place; or surrendered for cancellation following notice of revocation, suspension or monetary forfeiture proceedings. The third party may not be the subject of a cease and desist order which relates to amateur service operation and which is still in effect.
    (c) No station may transmit third party communications while being automatically controlled except a station transmitting a RTTY or data emission.
    (d) At the end of an exchange of international third party communications, the station must also transmit in the station identification procedure the call sign of the station with which a third party message was exchanged.

    [54 FR 25857, June 20, 1989; 54 FR 39535, Sept. 27, 1989, as amended at 71 FR 25982, May 3, 2006; 71 FR 66462, Nov. 15, 2006]

    In this case, I am the control operator with direct control over the radio doing the transmitting and the cb/FRS/GMRS operator is the third party who is "participating in stating their message"
    You seem to have completely A) misinterpreted this section B) missed section c) where it says automatic transmission (crossbanding) is not allowed and C) missed the section on prohibited transmissions:

    § 97.113 Prohibited transmissions.

    (c) No station shall retransmit programs or signals emanating from any type of radio station other than an amateur station, except propagation and weather forecast information intended for use by the general public and originated from United States Government stations, and communications, including incidental music, originating on United States Government frequencies between a manned spacecraft and its associated Earth stations. Prior approval for manned spacecraft communications retransmissions must be obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Such retransmissions must be for the exclusive use of amateur radio operators. Propagation, weather forecasts, and manned spacecraft communications retransmissions may not be conducted on a regular basis, but only occasionally, as an incident of normal amateur radio communications.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klierslc View Post
    So then, yes, I bend the rules a bit when it makes sense and am prepared to rip them up completely if the need arises, but I don't blatantly thumb my nose at the regulations. I will admit to the following violation if you'd like to report me to the FCC--My kids play with the FRS radios and have free run of the neighborhood--when I need them to come home, I'll send a brief transmission on the FRS channel at 5 watts from my ham radio as the FRS can't reach the other side of the lake where the playground is.

    Cheers!

    Dan
    Here's the thing: you don't have to rip them up at all if the need arises. You've already said the rules allow for doing whatever is needed in a true emergency. So there's no need for ripping. As for bending, fine, you want to play by your own rules because you just can't be bothered to have a couple extra radios around instead of one, or work within the limitations of a particular service. Whatever, I can't stop you and I'm not gonna report you (who does that?). Just don't go around promoting it like it's no big deal to people who don't know better. You wanna show your buddies on the trail how cool your hacked rig is since it can transmit on a bunch of different frequencies it isn't supposed to. I'm not there, I can't say anything, and you aren't interfering with my transmissions. But as soon as you get on a forum and start promoting these practices - especially when you misquote the rules to support your misguided ways - you can bet that I'll be correcting you every chance I get so that new users, who don't know better, don't get the idea that what you're talking about doing is perfectly fine. The FCC rules exist for good reasons, don't act like they don't.

    Also, you got your license 3 months ago. I'd suggest you spend some time with people who have a bit longer of a historical perspective.
    Last edited by aaronvogel; 11-17-2017 at 06:29 AM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    692
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    I'm going to start by saying: this is not specifically related to answering the original question of the thread. I would move this conversation to PM's but I feel there's inaccuracies that need to be corrected publicly. Apologies for the thread-jacking, I hope it will be informative to someone.
    My apologies also to the OP--I was simply trying to let you know that there are options out there that are much more capable and flexible than choosing one particular radio service.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    I absolutely have. Guilty as charged. What I haven't done is promoted that practice to student drivers. My issue isn't entirely with the practice as it is with the promotion of it. This is also a much more technical conversation than "do you speed", so the false equivalency is, in my opinion, what's crumbling. You want to say that since I speed I can't say murder is wrong? They're both illegal, and I'm doing one of them, right?
    I am saying that expressing moral outrage at the violation of a government regulation (not a criminal law) when you regularly violate another similar government regulation is a bit disingenuous (speaking of false equivalency...).

    Have you ever exceeded the speed limit in front of younger drivers? How do you know you aren't setting a bad example for another driver on the road? What about informing younger drivers about the advantages in time saved by going 5 over on a long trip? Then let them decide whether it is worth the risk. Really, this is not getting to the core of the issue--Each of us violates many laws on a daily basis--turn signal, speed, crosswalks, taxes, etc. The FCC regulations are not somehow sacrosanct and must be followed to the letter on pain of death--they are just like any other government regulation--to be generally followed, typically as long as the spirit of the law is met, there are no issues. For some reason a lot of Hams feel like that is not the case--not sure why.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    Do you really think CB, GMRS or FRS are going to do you a lick of good in an emergency situation? You surely know HF is going to be far more effective. So clearly you're not just hacking your radio for emergency use, it's convenience pure and simple.
    I think that whatever means of communication will get the message out will be the means of communication that I want to have. Slid off the side of a logging road in the PNW--I want a CB to talk to logging trucks. Stuck in the wilds of the eastern shore of Virginia, VHF marine channels may be the ticket. Out in an area that has a GMRS repeater but no 2m coverage, I definitely want the capability to access it if the need arises. HF is effective but I don't always have HF in the car with me. This has nothing to do with convenience, it has to do with preparedness.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    So here's my question: how do you know you're not interfering? If you're reaching out much further than either FRS or GMRS was ever intended to reach - which you almost definitely are - those you're interfering with won't be able to let you know on their legal radios.


    So now you're directly contradicting yourself: implying you'd only use it for emergencies, and now saying you find it useful... meaning you use it... which one is it?
    I already described where I used it--I do find it useful. Point taken about not being able to hear an FRS station, but as YOU also should be familiar with, talking over another station that you can't hear is not considered interference--it is part and parcel to radio operation and rampant on the HF bands. My 3-5 second transmission can hardly be classified as interference. If I am cross-banding, it is out in the back country away from any other users apart from my group.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    Yeah, having radios to spot people is fantastic, it is so much more clear than screaming and waving your arms. I carry an HT specifically for this. You can do the same with FRS/GMRS and CBs. And manually relaying traffic if people don't have matching gear is the right thing to do. Does it suck. Yeah. Get everyone on the same page. If you can't, work it out like you did. BTW, I'm glad you brought up the statute you did below, because it is directly talking about this: transmitting communications from other parties, such as stations on CB or FRS or GMRS.
    Surely you don't let an unlicensed person spot you with a 2m HT? The horror! Also, if I regularly went out with a group of folks, I would certainly encourage them all to become Hams. When I show up at a land cruiser or ExPo event with many folks who I have never met and may likely never meet again, "getting them on the same page" is a bit impractical to say the least. I applaud your efforts to get your group licensed, but that isn't realistic for a random group of folks meeting up for an event.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    You seem to have completely A) misinterpreted this section B) missed section c) where it says automatic transmission (crossbanding) is not allowed and C) missed the section on prohibited transmissions:

    § 97.113 Prohibited transmissions.

    (c) No station shall retransmit programs or signals emanating from any type of radio station other than an amateur station, except propagation and weather forecast information intended for use by the general public and originated from United States Government stations, and communications, including incidental music, originating on United States Government frequencies between a manned spacecraft and its associated Earth stations. Prior approval for manned spacecraft communications retransmissions must be obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Such retransmissions must be for the exclusive use of amateur radio operators. Propagation, weather forecasts, and manned spacecraft communications retransmissions may not be conducted on a regular basis, but only occasionally, as an incident of normal amateur radio communications.
    I did not ignore anything--I am choosing to apply the rule to people in my group, within a reasonable distance. Since the FCC gives no set distance that a person has to be within in order to participate in passing their message, I generally assume that if I can be heard via shouting, that is close enough. Is this fudging? Sure, but I also have physical control of the radio and can shut it down in less than a second--IMO this doesn't really qualify as automatic control--once again, maybe a bit of fudging, but ask yourself, what is the intent of that rule? IMO it is to keep non licensed users from transmitting through a repeater without a licensed radio operator supervising them. I am a licensed radio operator and I am supervising--Intent met.

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronvogel View Post
    Here's the thing: you don't have to rip them up at all if the need arises. You've already said the rules allow for doing whatever is needed in a true emergency. So there's no need for ripping. As for bending, fine, you want to play by your own rules because you just can't be bothered to have a couple extra radios around instead of one, or work within the limitations of a particular service. Whatever, I can't stop you and I'm not gonna report you (who does that?). Just don't go around promoting it like it's no big deal to people who don't know better. You wanna show your buddies on the trail how cool your hacked rig is since it can transmit on a bunch of different frequencies it isn't supposed to. I'm not there, I can't say anything, and you aren't interfering with my transmissions. But as soon as you get on a forum and start promoting these practices - especially when you misquote the rules to support your misguided ways - you can bet that I'll be correcting you every chance I get so that new users, who don't know better, don't get the idea that what you're talking about doing is perfectly fine. The FCC rules exist for good reasons, don't act like they don't.
    This is now twice where you have attributed actions or motives to me that I have not done or stated. I make no assumptions about you but simply take what you type at face value. I do not show my "buddies on the trail how cool my hacked rig is." It is simply a capability that I employ when needed. The OP was asking about different types of radios and who uses them--whatever his choice ends up being, I feel that it is useful to put out the information that there is are radios on the market that can do more than just transmit on a single service--even if you aren't a horrible person like me who violates the FCC regs, having that capability on board in case of an emergency is certainly worth considering when choosing a means of communication.

    Cheers,

    Dan
    1995 T100, Beater Edition
    1997 Land Cruiser, Family Crawler
    2001 Sequoia, Family Hauler
    2002 Camry, Commuter Chariot

    Never worry about biting off more than you can chew....your mouth is probably bigger than you think it is.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The Road
    Posts
    87

    Default Let’s get back on track.

    Capability vs legality arguments will rage, elsewhere. As the OP, I get that the FCC, in effect, you cannot have one unit that will communicate on all services. I also understand that making a radio unit to do just this is possible, though not legal. Got it, the pissing match can end.

    My question, for those with radio comms in their vehicle, why did you initially get radio comms, which radio service(s) did you choose, and how do you use your radio(s) now? Also understood are the comparative benefits, and drawbacks, of each service. Thanks for posting up why you got into radio, which radio service(s) you have chosen, and how your usage has grown or changed since getting into radio. I am sure any and all of us looking into on vehicle radio comms will appreciate your answers.

    Thanks

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA, USA
    Posts
    205
    I inherited a set of 4 Motorola GMRS handhelds. Good for car to car comms while driving at 1/4 mile+ distance between. No reason to switch to anything else.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •