Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Thread: Composite fiberglass/foam panel build question

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Foresthill, CA
    Posts
    311
    Evidently the embossed lettering causes a "film." The planing not only makes it more uniform but removes that. if you look at EU or AU panels they offer planed no lettering without the large (truckload) volumes needed that we have here in the states.
    If you play around with pulling the skins off you can take a thin layer of XPS off and see all the letter on the skin side. Adhesive dependent of course.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kuna Idaho
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottReb View Post
    StomperXJ,

    Be aware the panels that have printing on them, ie most XPS panels, have a film that interferes with adhesion. Dow and OC make panels that are planed at the factory for lamination. Not available in the US for less than 10K square feet. Just be aware.
    Aware and have a plan to cure this. Thanks!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kuna Idaho
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by Victorian View Post
    ... are not suitable for Composite panels in vehicle body construction.
    This isn't necessarily true from the testing I have done

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    628
    Quote Originally Posted by stomperxj View Post
    This isn't necessarily true from the testing I have done
    Nor mine. I'm still confused about the "film" ScottReb is referring to, unless it is the ink itself. At any rate a dog brush makes many fine grooves that penetrate the surface, and this greatly enhances adhesion.
    2016 Toyota Tundra SR 4x4 Double Cab Long Bed 5.7L..... DIY camper on the way...

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kuna Idaho
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by rruff View Post
    Nor mine. I'm still confused about the "film" ScottReb is referring to, unless it is the ink itself. At any rate a dog brush makes many fine grooves that penetrate the surface, and this greatly enhances adhesion.
    I bought a spiked carpet seam roller that seems to work well at putting nice divots in the foam for more surface area for the glue.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    628
    Quote Originally Posted by stomperxj View Post
    I bought a spiked carpet seam roller that seems to work well at putting nice divots in the foam for more surface area for the glue.
    I tried one of those as well as a wallpaper perforate. The dog brush is the best. This type.

    2016 Toyota Tundra SR 4x4 Double Cab Long Bed 5.7L..... DIY camper on the way...

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kuna Idaho
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by rruff View Post
    I tried one of those as well as a wallpaper perforate. The dog brush is the best. This type.
    Cool thanks for the tip

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by stomperxj View Post
    This isn't necessarily true from the testing I have done
    I wanted to know more about that topic and called our plastics engineer in Germany. He told me that they do very expensive tests in a lab to simulate years of usage on the road. Standard hardware store foams failed! They simply fractured or turned into dust. After all they are designed to be used in buildings that don't move.
    Same goes for fasteners, epoxies and other adhesives that are not designed for that application. Even though composite panels look very simple to make, there is a lot of engineering and expensive materials going into them.
    Don't get me wrong, I don't want you to drop everything. But I thought it's important for people to know that there is a difference.
    http://totalcomposites.com/ your supplier for European designed fiberglass sandwich panels and accessories.
    https://www.facebook.com/totalcompos...homepage_panel

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kuna Idaho
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by Victorian View Post
    I wanted to know more about that topic and called our plastics engineer in Germany. He told me that they do very expensive tests in a lab to simulate years of usage on the road. Standard hardware store foams failed! They simply fractured or turned into dust. After all they are designed to be used in buildings that don't move.
    Same goes for fasteners, epoxies and other adhesives that are not designed for that application. Even though composite panels look very simple to make, there is a lot of engineering and expensive materials going into them.
    Don't get me wrong, I don't want you to drop everything. But I thought it's important for people to know that there is a difference.
    I'm sure that RTM-X is the correct choice for refrigeration truck applications and other vehicles that see hundreds of thousands of miles per year over the road. Unfortunately that foam isn't available in small quantities in the US. I won't be using consumer grade adhesive either. If your panels came in big enough sizes and I could afford them I'd be going that route.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Foresthill, CA
    Posts
    311
    According to Dow and OC their planed, laminate designed version of panels are the same construction/make up as their building panel, densities being equal. Ive only spoken with the US reps for both, but the specs for RTM appears the same. Victorian is most certainly the authority and the Europeans have been doing this for longer than we have so they might have further developed the materials. The homebuilt airplane crowd has been using standard XPS for years, in similar densities, with great success.

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •