Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Thread: 2017 4Runner Premium vs '08 Loaded Cruiser

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Overwatch
    Posts
    2,989

    Default 2017 4Runner Premium vs '08 Loaded Cruiser

    Oh boy - maybe I just need to type this out to clear my thinking but I have an interesting dilemma:

    New 4runner Premium with sunroof but no KDSS (it is 6-8 months away on order and no dealers near have it either) and 1.9% financing with full new car warranty

    or

    Loaded 08 Land Cruiser with 120K on the clock, 3.9% but $10K less than the 4runner.


    * Will be my only vehicle

    * Warranty is super nice to have, but a clean history and PPI on the 120K Cruiser is pretty good indicator of things to come.

    * Smaller Rig would make day to day life easier with parking

    * Larger Rig will be uber comfy and safe

    * Both will have real value in 5+ years, the LC having already taken it's lumps

    UGH!!! Thoughts?

    Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 4.45.05 PM.jpg vs image_176713_img_7628.jpg
    Last edited by Schattenjager; 12-08-2017 at 06:46 AM.
    Chance favors the prepared mind.

    All cowardice comes from not loving, or not loving well, which is the same thing. EH

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    208
    Another LC vs. 4-runner thread...sweet! Take the LC for 10K less and enjoy for many years to come.
    1994 FZJ80-118K Miles-OME Lift-WARN 8K, Harrop/Eaton E-Locker, 35" Toyos, ARB front, Prinsu rack, etc., blah blah

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    350
    4 Runner for me

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Overwatch
    Posts
    2,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Upland80 View Post
    Another LC vs. 4-runner thread...sweet! Take the LC for 10K less and enjoy for many years to come.
    I hesitated a moment because I thought it might be over done, or get trolled - but this is a specific situation and not as conceptual as some 'vs' threads.

    Also, some of the ExPo membership has been proven to be valuable contributors in the past, often bringing up overlooked or seldom consider points of view, which is what I am seeking before pulling the trigger.

    I hope that if someone cannot make a material contribution, they will just move on. Rare indeed, but it is a hope.
    Chance favors the prepared mind.

    All cowardice comes from not loving, or not loving well, which is the same thing. EH

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    350
    Let me clarify my thoughts then, these days I dont have time to work on stuff and I stack a lot of miles on. 4Runner should be plenty reliable, decent on fuel, capable and well supported aftermarket. LC's are great, but I would take the Runner over a 9 year old LC with 120K

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    26
    I just went through a similar dilemma. I like both trucks. I debated this for months and trolled several sites including ih8mud. It was a tough decision, but for what i was going to end up paying for a 4Runner Pro, I ended up purchasing an extremely clean 2013 LC with 46K miles for the same price. LC has an extended warranty and is covered until 92K miles.

    Here were my take aways.

    4Runner gets better fuel economy out of the box. Start putting larger tires on it and it quickly goes down. Larger tires on LC cause fuel economy to go down as well, but not as quickly as the AWD has already put a big dent in it.

    Specs say the back is bigger in 4Runner, but i dont believe it. I have a friend/coworker with the 4runner and we can get way more stuff in the back of the land cruiser.

    Also, i got rid of my Silverado and the LC has a better towing capacity so that was a selling point for me as well.

    The 4runner is better off road out of the box than the LC, but at $40K plus I wasn't looking to take either rock crawling (thats what my FZJ80 is for). LC is extremely capable, but she's fat....

    LC is way more comfortable. It will easily cruise at 90mph and is just as easy to park as 4Runner. Seats in both leave something to be desired. If comfort is an issue, consider LX570. It has better seats and is cheaper than LC in the secondary market. Also, you can lift it 2" in your driveway for free. Just a little elbow grease.

    LC is quick. Not that you want to take them drag racing, but in real world driving, its nice to have. On ramps are a breeze.
    1996 SAS'd K1500 (babybluebeast) - Sold
    1993 FZJ80 3xLocked (littlegreenmonster) - Play toy
    2013 URJ200 (big julie) - DD and road trip truck
    1975 FJ40 - in pieces....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by babybluebeast View Post
    I just went through a similar dilemma. I like both trucks. I debated this for months and trolled several sites including ih8mud. It was a tough decision, but for what i was going to end up paying for a 4Runner Pro, I ended up purchasing an extremely clean 2013 LC with 46K miles for the same price. LC has an extended warranty and is covered until 92K miles.

    Here were my take aways.

    4Runner gets better fuel economy out of the box. Start putting larger tires on it and it quickly goes down. Larger tires on LC cause fuel economy to go down as well, but not as quickly as the AWD has already put a big dent in it.

    Specs say the back is bigger in 4Runner, but i dont believe it. I have a friend/coworker with the 4runner and we can get way more stuff in the back of the land cruiser.

    Also, i got rid of my Silverado and the LC has a better towing capacity so that was a selling point for me as well.

    The 4runner is better off road out of the box than the LC, but at $40K plus I wasn't looking to take either rock crawling (thats what my FZJ80 is for). LC is extremely capable, but she's fat....

    LC is way more comfortable. It will easily cruise at 90mph and is just as easy to park as 4Runner. Seats in both leave something to be desired. If comfort is an issue, consider LX570. It has better seats and is cheaper than LC in the secondary market. Also, you can lift it 2" in your driveway for free. Just a little elbow grease.

    LC is quick. Not that you want to take them drag racing, but in real world driving, its nice to have. On ramps are a breeze.
    I think it's safe to say there is no wrong answer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by perterra View Post
    I think it's safe to say there is no wrong answer.
    i agree.

    Again, consider an LX570 too. That is what Slee uses as their shop trail truck now.
    1996 SAS'd K1500 (babybluebeast) - Sold
    1993 FZJ80 3xLocked (littlegreenmonster) - Play toy
    2013 URJ200 (big julie) - DD and road trip truck
    1975 FJ40 - in pieces....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,277
    I asked this question several years ago. A good friend and truck nut put this way. Do you want to pay what 43k for a 40k 4Runner? Or do you want to pay 42k for a 80k LC? Which would you rather be driving? I drove home in a LC two days later. Ha ha

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Schattenjager View Post

    New 4runner Pro with sunroof but no KDSS (it is 6-8 months away on order and no dealers near have it either) and 1.9% financing with full new car warranty

    Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 4.45.05 PM.jpg vs image_176713_img_7628.jpg
    Are you SURE its a new TRD Pro and not a TRD Off Road Premium converted to a Pro?

    The reason I ask is that TRD Pros dont come with sunroofs. (in the U.S.)

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •