Thread: Why Do Some Flathead Engines Use Pushrods and Rocker Arms Instead Of Tappets?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    154

    Default Why Do Some Flathead Engines Use Pushrods and Rocker Arms Instead Of Tappets?

    I thought one of the advantages a flathead could boast against overhead valve arrangements was their ultra simplicity, specifically their lack of valvetrain components. But Indian flathead v-twins used pushrods and rocker arms instead of tappets--why?

    Further, is a flathead engine using pushrods and rocker arms going to be a better performer than a flathead using tappets?

    I really like old school engine swaps, and lately have been contemplating going flathead for a special project.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,610

    Cool Good questions, but no simple answer.

    This sounds so simple, but the deeper the understanding of how an engine works, the more complicated those questions are.
    A simple post isn't going to answer your question near to any acceptable level.
    The "easy out" answer is; "It depends".

    Your questions fill entire lifetimes of engineering study.
    Today we still have the same design questions. We've designed all kinds of different valve arrangements, and even engines that don't use valves.

    Ask two engineers what the best valve train system is, and you'll get at least three different answers.

    The good news on these old flathead engines is, that there is a lot of excellent information on pretty much any Flathead engine out there.
    So, if I were in your shoes, I'd look for the engine that best suits the purpose of your build, regardless of valve arrangement.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Jämte i exil
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by nicholastanguma View Post
    I thought one of the advantages a flathead could boast against overhead valve arrangements was their ultra simplicity, specifically their lack of valvetrain components. But Indian flathead v-twins used pushrods and rocker arms instead of tappets--why?

    Further, is a flathead engine using pushrods and rocker arms going to be a better performer than a flathead using tappets?

    I really like old school engine swaps, and lately have been contemplating going flathead for a special project.
    Odd question..!
    Anyway, I dont think flathead with rockers is a sound design for couple reasons.
    Vaguely I know of Indian motors using that design. Where is that design now..? Obscure to say the least.
    Given the confines of flathead motor with its valves on the same side of cylinder as its timing gears. Suspect that design was a way to provide distance between valves.
    Rockers are additional recriprocating parts pivoting a shaft. Directly pushing tappets via rotating cam seems better efficiency.
    Last edited by Verkstad; 01-07-2018 at 05:52 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    83
    Whats more puzling to me is why doesnt anyone use these rotary valves which have been around for a couple decades at least..

    http://www.coatesengine.com/csrv-advantages.html
    2008 Silverado 4.8 V8 ,air,,G80 locker,110.000km..homebuilt camper made of plywood and epoxy,.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    PNW USA
    Posts
    1,597
    I don't think that the engines with the rocker arms are "true" flathead engines - they are an in between design which was an attempt to improve the performance of the engine by allowing larger valves to be fitted since one is in the traditional flathead position (in the block) and the other valve is in the head.

    Here is an excellent summary of the idea - they call it an "F" head engine...

    http://www.curbsideclassic.com/autom...f-head-engine/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •