My thoughts on vvti vs. non-vvti
I just wanted to chime in here about the vvti motor vs. the non-vvti motor.
I have a 2003 100-series and recently bought a 2006 100-series. I have a decent amount of experience with Toyotas:
http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/134871-My-Comparo-Old-Taco-vs-LC-vs-4Runner
Anyhoo, here in the Rockies, the vvti feels significantly more powerful. I know it's only about 15% more power, but the hp curve must be different. Driving a 2003 against the 2006 up the passes here is very eye opening. They both have the 5-speed auto tranny. Both are totally stock. My 2003 is in great condition. The 2006 easily holds 74mph (I only drive 9mph over the speed limit to avoid tickets), has much less downshifting, passes with gusto, and is a much more enjoyable drive. When I use cruise control now, it doesn't downshift on the mild slopes with headwind! MPG is about the same.
Maybe at sea level the difference is not very large. If you are at altitude, have lots of armor, or towing then I wholeheartedly recommend the vvti. I can feel the difference.
Oh yeah, if that emission things craps out then you can bypass it for about $200.
For me it is well worth the money.
My perfect Land Cruiser would be a 2006/07, low miles, Non-AHC, No nav, single owner, no wrecks, all records, tan interior, white exterior.
I'm not sure this unicorn exists in North America....