On post on page three refers to an Extreme ?Offroad test. It was actually a RIPP SC vs. a 5.7 Hemi. But if you look at the dyno runs you will see that they started high in the rpm range to hide the RIPP's lack of torque down low, and they cut the Hemi ~1,700rpm's off its top, which hid its high rev HP. So the test was no test at all. Those who have driven both, including RIPP owners report that the Hemi is a lot more powerful down low, as you would expect, but also when winding out. But a Jeep isn't a race car and the RIPP does improve highway performance. It's the engine's boosted survivability that is a the question.
BTW, a RIPP SC'd engine will run with the SC belt removed as a get home measure if the SC goes. But again, imo, it isn't the SC's life span that is in question, its the engine's bottom end.
There is another option available that offers almost Hemi performance and better fuel economy with an even better transmission, all at about the same cost. That option is the GM 5.3 and 6l80 swap. Reported mileage on the highway is in the mid to high teens and highway high teens to as much as 20 or 21. I'll dig up the name of the company that has overcome the computer issues. (They also offer a 6.2 conversion, but that is not the practical choice.)
As far as milage, I don't really care. But range is important to me, so I added an 18 gal auxilliary tank to my Hemi JKU. Highway range is well beyond 500 miles, which is further than my bladder, wife, children or dogs can go without a stop. Off road range is about 300 miles with a 20% reserve. (I average 9mpg off road in the Moab area, the only place I have been where I repeatedly spend a whole day off road.)
I built my Jeep for the use Rovertrader writes is his goal. And also hunting and fishing, for the capability and to keep the inevitable mess out of my DD. I went with 37's because my young son wanted the "BIG MEATS" and they actually offer no downside except ingress/egress and garage height. But a more practical choice would be 34's or 35's. For suspensions, either the AEV 3.5" suspension or the forthcoming 2.5" suspension would be perfect. The ride and handling are remarkable, better than stock. My Jeep rides better than my Suburban, my wife's just sold Range Rover Sport or her essentially stock JKU, handles better than all except the RR.
An added bonus of the AEV suspensions is their weight carrying ability. They can handle as much and more weight than you can pack into a JKU and a trailer too.
JPK