FJ Cruiser three year review

Corey

OverCamping Specialist
I have had my FJ Cruiser since July the 24th of 2006.
I ordered it back in March of the same year.

Though this review is a little late, I would like to share my thoughts on the rig.
It just turned 24,373 miles at 3 am yesterday when I gassed it up before work.

I called the dealer the other day as it is ready for an oil change and I asked about the plugs and he said wait until it turns 30K before getting the plugs done if it is running perfect.

I must admit it is running perfectly and the only thing that has been done to it is regular oil changes, lube, and a few air filter changes.
No squeaks rattles, or other pesky things have cropped up.
And I am only on the second windshield.
These flat windshields are more prone to chips/cracks than a normal slanted window.

The rig is far from stock though as it has the OME 2.5" lift, ARB front bumper, Warn XD9000 winch, Bentup sliderz, ******** Cepek Mountaincat mud tires sized over stock at 285x70x17, a Safari snorkel, Autohome Maggiolina AirLander roof top tent, ect...
And it still accelerates as fast as it did when it was bone stock.

The gas mileage when new was close to 21 MPG combined city/highway, now I am down to around 17 MPG combined city/highway with the above equipment on it.
The first set of mud tires where the biggest hit to the lower MPG.
In fact this is my second set of the same tires, the first ones were of the stock size, and I immediately went from around 21 MPG down to 19 MPG, so you can see the hit that put on the MPG.

The performance is the same though, it feels like a rocket ship to me after coming from a 2nd gen '91 4Runner with the 3.0 and an automatic transmission.

I have zero complaints on the rig.
I keep reading about blind spots, I do not see them.
But then I use to drive semi trucks part time long ago, and I drive rigs at work that require me to depend a lot on using mirrors to drive with.
I have the FJs mirrors adjusted accordingly to see properly out of.
Although seeing out the back is not the greatest due to the spare tire there, I really hardly use the rear window anyways to navigate the roads with.

The handling has been affected by adding the roof top tent to the factory rack as it sits a little to high, and on a windy day coming home from work I can get pushed around a little.
This is not due to the weight but more to the fact that between the top of the roof and the bottom of the tent is a good amount of space there that wind can move around trying to blow me off course.
Not bad on a calm day, but when windy can be a little nerve racking.
Working on that solution though with a vendor on this forum for a rack that will lower the tent substantially which should yield better handling when it is windy out.

Of all of Toyotas current lineup the FJ Cruiser is really the only rig I would buy brand new.
I do like the Tacomas very much too, and I would not hesitate to build one up for a daily driver/expo rig, but the FJ is my first choice.
The new 4Runner coming out does not do anything for me as it seems it is getting more plush each year.

The FJ Cruiser for me is a vehicle more back to Toyotas roots for an off road/expo oriented type vehicle.

4WD lever for the transfercase, no carpet, no leather seats, ect.
The two latter items make cleaning up the rig after a day of off roading, camping, dragging along the mountain bike and wearing dirty bike shorts/jerseys makes cleaning up the rig a lot easier.

I find the seats very comfortable in the rigs, and there is plenty of headroom.
Even when wearing my camping/safari hat.
I have heard the FJ Cruiser has more headroom than others in the Toyota lineup.

Seeing out the shorter/straight windshield has never been a problem for me, and seeing those three wiper blades called into action when the sky opens up still looks cool to me.

If anything were to happen to this rig I would replace it with a 2010 FJ Cruiser, maybe even the new green color which looks pretty good.

For my lifestyle though of back country camping, exploring, mountain biking, this is the perfect rig for me.

These rigs are pretty tough too.
Back in June of 2007 I was sitting at a red light in my town heading out to do the weeks grocery shopping.
All of a sudden I felt a slight impact, and I knew I had just been rear ended.
I jumped out and a Ford Ranger was folded up like an accordion in the front.
his truck was totaled.

Mine?
Rear bumper needed to be replaced, the tailpipe, the rear door, and a few trim items.
He hit me at about 25 to 30 MPH.
I drove home, he did not.
My rig was fixed, frame checked which was perfect, good as new afterwards.

The rig continues to start conversations with others when I am out on the road, at the store, or getting fueled up.

I am very happy that Toyota introduced this vehicle.
I am surprised that it is still being produced as it was only suppose to be a short run on these as a limited production model.
Nice to see that it did make it another year for 2010.

Anyways, I am stocked about this vehicle, and it and a few other things (Overland Journal) have gotten me interested in camping again after taking about a decade off from camping.
I use to go every other weekend with my two sons when they were younger from about May through September.

Here are a few pics of how the rig has evolved over the years.
Day I brought it home in the first pic, then the mods came very fast from being excited about this new rig from Toyota.

Overall I am 100% satisfied with what Toyota offered this rig up as.

sliderz_guitar1%20(Custom).jpg


todd16.jpg


10.jpg


11.jpg


corey5a.jpg


33.jpg


Who needs rear seats?

7.jpg


1.jpg


2.jpg


8.jpg
 

larryt

Observer
Thank you for the detailed review. The FJC remains on my short list of new-to-me vehicles, in no small part because of watching your build-up.
 

78Bronco

Explorer
I thought the newer plugs were platinums that were good to 60k miles. Why are you changing them so early?
 

Corey

OverCamping Specialist
Thanks guys.
Any engine bay shots? =)
Just from my dual battery installation which should be in my build thread in the sig.
No engine bay body rips for me.
I thought the newer plugs were platinums that were good to 60k miles. Why are you changing them so early?
I would never run plats, at least not in a Toyota.
Toyotas are known to run at their best on the stock Nippon Denso or the NGK plugs.
In fact they come with both.
For some reason Toyota puts the Nippons on one bank, and the NGKs on the other bank.
They have done that for ages.
 

FireGuy

Adventurer
Great thread. Very informative. I do find it hard to believe that with armor, 285's, fridge, bumper, RRT, etc you are still getting 17 MPG. For all that extra weight and wind drag, 17 mpg would be downright outstanding.
 

Corey

OverCamping Specialist
Thanks TeJa.

Scott, I am a pretty conservative driver.
I do not drive in the left lane on the freeways, I stick to the right lane are do not go over 62 MPH pretty much.

Jackrabbit starts I grew out of long ago too.
If I were to switch over to an AT style tire, the mileage might even go back up a bit more.
Also if I took the freeway into work (I come home on it) instead of taking a 35 to 40 MPH back road into work, I might do better than the current 17 MPG I get now.

I like the peace and quiet though of the back road into work, plus I get to see all the shops the two cities I drive through going into work.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,125
Messages
2,913,231
Members
231,813
Latest member
Kc_trailhawk
Top