GX 470 vs 3rd Gen Montero ..... or maybe 100 series Cruiser

Montana Cruiser

Adventurer
I'm looking for a new ride, it needs to haul clients occasionally and quickly convert to my expo rig when not. I've owned and built 80 series cruisers, but looking for a bit more highway comfort. The 100 series would be an obvious choice, and is still a consideration, but the in town mileage is unappealing and I'm positive I want VVT-i if I go Toyota, so 05' and newer in my price range is getting hard to find. I have been looking hard at GX 470's w/ KDSS if possible, but now these Montero's are catching my eye. I'm wondering what your overall thoughts are on a expo rig, no hard wheeling, that will haul clients and easily convert to expo duty. I like both the Montero and GX for that taller body and possibility for a platform for sleeping, holding my fridge and the swing out rear door. I've most recently been running a mildly built 3rd Gen 4Runner and would stick with something like that, but that back seat is tight for clients. What would you buy, the GX or Montero? Asking in this forum for you bias ;)
 

off-roader

Expedition Leader
What kind of fuel economy does the gx get? I know the full sized early cruisers sucked on that. I get better gas mileage now with armor and 35's than a stock 100 series or earlier vintage LC.
 

mhiscox

Expedition Leader
You're right that the in-town mpgs for a Hundy aren't great, but what mid-2000s big, cushy 3-row SUV does significantly better? None that I know of. And you can get 17-19 on the highway, versus the EPA Highway rating of 16. That, in combination with a 26 gallon tank, gives you decent highway range. More to the point, neither of your other possibilities is going to do a lot better. In '05 the combined MPGs were 13 for the LX and 15 for the Montero and GX, so it'd cost about $500 more a year in fuel for the Hundred, which in not insignificant, but the difference in purchase price will be a bigger factor.

I've driven many a GX and, no surprise given all the shared components, they're a lot like the LX/Landcruiser. In the 2005 period you're talking about, the LX/LC were actually a ways behind the curve development-wise, and the GX, with Downhill and Hill Start controls, KDSS (if you can find it; it was not a common option) and a bit more sophisticated electronics, seemed slightly more advanced than the LX. But those small differences are probably less a decision point than the styling and, especially, the rear opening. To my eyes, the 100 is the better looking truck--mostly because the GX has a taller profile, though that admittedly has advantages--and its combination tailgate/liftgate arrangement is my very favorite setup for overlanding. The single swingout rear door on the GX never appealed to me, in part because my garage stalls (indeed, many garage stalls) are too short to let you open the GX rear with the overhead door closed. Also, things like rear hatch tents, the Kelty Carport, etc. don't work with the swinging door. But many people obviously side with Montana Cruiser, though, as Lexus has stuck with that arrangement for over a decade now.

The second row seats in a Hundy are very well liked by occupants, important when putting clients there. The third row seats aren't great in the Hundreds, but the GX third row is almost unusable by adults because it is very cramped.

Aftermarket support for the Hundreds is better. The GX is more of a challenge, but there are very nice GX overlanders, and I know there's at least one with an extensive build thread here on the Portal.

Unfortunately, I can't talk knowledgeably about a Montero. All I could contribute is to point out the obvious facts that aftermarket support is limited and their probably aren't 10% as many dealerships as Lexus+Toyota.

Good luck in your decision making.
 
I have driven both and I was impressed with both vehicles for different reasons. The GX is a little rocket ship. With the 4.7L V8 they are quick and nimble. The Montero is nowhere near as powerful but it has more legroom and headroom. In my opinion you can't go wrong with either vehicle. Personally I would go with the Montero because is more affordable and has more interior room, but I am 6'8" so legroom and headroom are always major considerations. Over the years I have owned two LX450's and two Montero's and I am thoroughly convinced that the Montero's are every bit as nice as the Land Cruisers. If you are looking to get a Montero make sure you get the one with the 3.8 liter engine or 2003-2006.
 

Toasty

Looking for that thing i just had in my hand...
100 series or J-120 (GX 4xx) over the Gen 3 any day. Montero (Gen 1 or 2) over the 100 or the 120 any day. I'd even take a Gen 2 over an 80 series but that's me.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,369
Messages
2,915,957
Members
232,189
Latest member
Jonny Adventures

Members online

Top