Rear tire mount pro's/con's

Pad

Adventurer
Just wanted people's opinioins on rear tire mounts (spare).
I'm loosing about 2/3 of my under deck storage do to my spare (35"). I would need to go with a swing away style because I have a tailgate (not barndoor). The thought of having to swing the spare away to access the upper hatch does not seem optimal but a lesser evil?. I only put the roof rack on for long trips and thats is too much weight up top for my taste. I have a heavy bumper so mounting to it is not a problem, or drilling holes in body for a second mount. My concerns are A)loosing departure angle B)loosing visiblity, not a huge issue C) costs, thinking of going with a used or junk yard find. Not concerned with high-lift mount or other stuff.
What are the pro's/con's? I want to explore the options before I begin down a one-way street of drilling etc.

Thanks for the insight,
Pad
 

ujoint

Supporting Sponsor
I decided not to mount my spare on the back for a few reasons. One is weight, one of my tires weighs in @ 140lbs. The second is that I use my receiver for my bike rack, so I would have to install an extension, making the rig even longer. The 3rd is that I would have to build a mount super strong to hold the heavy tire, adding a ton of weight. So what I do is throw the spare on the roof rack for trips, keep it inside for daily driving.
 

JIMBO

Expedition Leader
:truck: Well, my pros/cons

--Pros
--1) Acessability
--2) Ease of pressure chk
--3) backup TREE bumper

--Cons
--1) slight loss of visability
--2)????????????????????

--
IMGP0422.jpg

--I wouldn't have it ANY other way and I pull a trailer !!

--:tent: --JIMBO
 

davegonz

Explorer
For daily driving, the swing outs (two on my old truck) were pain in the *** due to loss of visibility and the extra hassle of opening and closing them when I needed to access the rear cargo area.
 

ntsqd

Heretic Car Camper
If you do opt for a swing-a-way you really do not want it mounted to the body. Body mounted swing-a-ways are notorious for tearing up the body.
 

bigredpigdriver

Adventurer
always on the rear

I have always had swing-away style tire holder, heck I am backing one for my new XJ. Going to do something new this time, going to make two swings, driver side will be the tire, passenger side will hold the fuel and water jugs. I have not lost any angles.:safari-rig:
 

Guinness44

Adventurer
Prefer swingaway also. A spare is kind of heavy for a roofrack (and is there really a hill to back to when you need to load that tire?). Visibility, mirrors work, using stickon fisheyes. Also have a fresnal lense on the back window (which doesnt work with the sun hitting it, but works pretty well othertimes).
 

truck mechanic

Adventurer
I built one for my 72 Scout, I love it. I built it so its far enough from the body that I can lift the top gate without moving the tire and its low enough that it doent interfer with seeing whats behind me. Also it doesnt seem to affect my departure angle . but the truck is lifted 6 ins.
Paul
 

spressomon

Expedition Leader
I have the Slee rear bumper with swing-out on my Land Cruiser 100-series. Yeah its a hassle sometimes when accessing the rear hatch. But it's a bigger hassle for me to either store the spare: Inside the vehicle; on the roof; or underneath.

So for me it's easily the lesser of the evils.

On the plus side: My Slee swingout carrier doesn't come loose or rattle...he designed and fabbed it for rock solid usability. And it has a nice secure place to mount the Hi Lift too.
 

Mike S

Sponsor - AutoHomeUSA
I have a Kaymar swing away carrier on my 80. I used the stock carrier on my old FJ40 for about 13 years. IMO there really isn't a better option for carrying a tire if you don't want (or can't have) it under the vehicle. Inside sucks, roof top mount sucks, mount on the hood (ala Series LR) also sucks.

The only real downstroke is that you have to deal with the tire EVERY time you access the rear of the truck. No way around it.

M
 

jh504

Explorer
I have recently gone to a swing away rack on my XJ and I really like it. I have 6 inches of lift and I have had it in some hard angles but there has not been an issue with departure angles. Having to open it before I open the hatch isnt a big deal to me, it takes two seconds of very little effort. The loss of some sight out of my rear window is probably the only issue I dont like, but when I'm loaded down I cant see out of the back anyway, I use fisheye mirrors like a previous post said. If you drive ambulances or other types of utility trucks you cant see out of the back window anyway.
All in all, I am very happy with mine.
 

The BN Guy

Expedition Leader
There is always the option of...

in town driving simply leave the spare at home. Save the weight on commuting.

for overland have a removable swing gate. Unless someone can sway me not to go THAT direction.
 

cpg

Adventurer
The BN Guy said:
There is always the option of...

in town driving simply leave the spare at home. Save the weight on commuting.

for overland have a removable swing gate. Unless someone can sway me not to go THAT direction.
Exactly what I do. Unless I am heading out of town the spare stays in the garage.
 

Pad

Adventurer
Thanks for all the responces!
Looks like a pretty good mix of like/dislikes.
I think if a cheap option presents itself I will go with it,
maybe a used H-2 style (cheap,yeah right), I do prefer
everything on the inside though.
With the kids and dogs the 100"wb Rangie gets real short real fast.

Again thanks!
Pad
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,106
Messages
2,924,026
Members
233,414
Latest member
dhuss
Top