The OME shocks are what I don't like, not the springs. The damping just doesn't match up very well with the Fox's, and if I'm being hard on the rig I think they start to fade. Everyone that rides in my back seat says something along the lines of "Are you going to get shocks like what you have in the front for the back? It's pretty bumpy back here."What is it you don't like about the OME's? I'm looking at putting a set of either 891 or 892 springs on my 99. What leingth and travel did you decide were best?
I'm also dreaming of some 255's, but I have 4.11's. Does the performance and milage suffer a lot? Would 4.56's be too much of a change if I'm looking to keep things enjoyable down the HW as well?
Thanks!
Clark
P.S. AWESOME LOOKING RIG!
I ran my 255's with 4.10 gearing for around 10k miles. It wasn't too bad, it still cruised on the freeway just fine. Big hills and mountain passes became slow going though. I just changed to 4.30 gears about 3k miles ago and that helped some, but I really need 4.56's. I have the 5-speed manual though, if you have the auto tranny you would most likely want 4.88's.
IIRC, with 4.56's, 5-speed and 255's the RPM's should only be 100 or 200 higher at 70MPH than when the rig was stock.
I have the standard ones. N86 I believe is their model number.Do you know which OME shocks you had? There are 2 sets, one of which is way to soft. Your truck looks good.
I got the Fox C/O's as a present from a best friend. IIRC, they run around $1400. I have never ridden in another Taco or 3G 4Runner with C/O's before so I dont know how they compare to other C/O's. I haven't been able to weld the sliders on yet... I should be getting them on soon though.Very nice build!
What did those Fox C/O's cost you? Do you know how their ride compares to any of the other C/O options out there?
How do you like those Stubb's sliders? Those are the same ones that I am looking at getting.