Search results

I do indeed. Shipping to Overland HQ: 3035 N. Tarra Ave, Suite 1, Prescott, AZ 86301. Thanks again!

Thanks Zonker. Send me your PayPal info and if I don't have it sorted out today I'll send you some cash for postage.

Sorry, some contact info would help on my part: chazz@expeditionportal.com :)

I have an older iMac I need to get wiped and reset to factory defaults. Unfortunately, it's too old for Lion/Mountain Lion/Mavericks and I haven't been able to track down the 10.6.8 disc that came with it. Anyone have a Mac OS 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) disc I can borrow? I'll cover shipping both ways.

Hmm... guess that answers my question on if I'm nuts for even considering towing The Mule behind the Foz. :sombrero:

Another good looking belt, nice and slim. You do loose the load bearing capacity to gain that low profile though, I noticed they actually caution against using it as a backup harness. I've only had my Wilderness for 3 years, but I haven't had a problem with it coming loose yet.

I'm fond of the Wilderness tactical belt for much the same reasons, and moved up to it from the 5.11 (also a nice belt). The Wilderness does stay shut better and has far more sizing options. The buckle also doesn't poke out as bad from under an untucked shirt...

The S95/100 is still my all-time favorite travel camera. Printable quality (just), with a no fuss size and ease of use.

There's nothing wrong with a point and shoot, as long as it's a decent one. The shooter, and post, are more important than the hardware used. (for reference, most of my trip reports and gear reviews were done with a point and shoot until late-2012)

I'd venture a guess that this is true more often than not. A lot of it is in control and composition, but much is done in post. Some of the "purists" may disagree, but Photoshop (or other) is as essential a part of digital photography as the darkroom was to film photography. Here's the same set...

I'd feel comfortable up to about two feet with a firm surface. The intake is currently right around 27-28", though I might be able to temporarily squeeze another 6" out of it since the throttle body points straight up at the hood. Thanks for the tip, I'll keep a tarp handy just in case...

Indeed. I suppose if it comes to it I could speed up to around 60 and glide across the water on the skid plates (kidding). :)

Thanks Scott. Hopefully it dries out a little more before we get to the crossing, 30" is going to be pushing it for the vehicle we'll be in... :eek:

Much better... :)

Great photos and a nice write-up. It looks like perfect weather down there right now, we'll be running the 'Road ourselves the end of the month. I'm guessing that Scout has 35" tire? About how deep did the worst of the water crossings look when you were there?

The 2004 Land Rover Discovery is undisputeably the ultimate off-pavement vehicle. :jump: If we're sticking to small vehicles, I'm quite fond of the Jimny. With rock crawling out of the equation, the taller vehicles in Subaru's line-up could also be in the running (capable, reliable...

Cool idea, I'm excited to see how it turns out. I've often wondered what the truck would be like with a little more height.

Part II Begins...

Beautiful Disco, hopefully I'll have the chance to check it out in person one day.

Moved to the Other Custom Expedition Campers forum, you'll be more likely to get views/answers here.