4.88 vs. 4.56 in a 2006

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I posted in a couple of older threads but haven't received much input, and I'm hungry for responses :)

I was considering only locking the read and forgetting re-gearing the diffs and the front locker. I have decided to discount that option and do a re-gear and lock both the front and rear while I'm in there.

Car:

2006 V8 4Runner
OME lift
255/85R16 tires
Skids, bumpers, armor, etc. = weighs 5,500 without passenger or a load, with passenger/load close to 6,000-lbs. Also tow a 2000-lb AT Chaser occasionally.
Typical cruise speeds is 65-70-MPH. Can I and will I drive faster on occasion? Surely, but rarely for an extended distance and then I'm willing to sacrifice noise/mpg if needed.

The car used to be pretty quick when it was bone stock, now not so much. But wait there's more... More than just the typical lift, tires, and weight. I live and travel at 5,000-ft and above, drive in the hills & mountains often, and we often have lots of wind. All of these factors impact performance.

For months I was convinced that 4.56 gears were the way to go. I think most of us are concerned about gearing rigs too low, but maybe we should be more concerned about gearing that is too high, as this is the problem with stock gearing and the reason to change from it.

When the 4Runner was bone stock it would turn 1900-rpm at 65-mph.

Now with 255s and 3.73s it turns about 1766-rpm. The RPM numbers don't tell the whole story because they don't factor for weight gain and the driving conditions. 4.11 gears would be closest to stock rpm, but that is not nearly enough change for the money nor all the changes made to the car. 4.56 gears will be available near the end of this month and 4.88s are already available, both from JT.

There is little difference between 4.56 and 4.88s. About 150-rpm at 65 in O/D, and about 180-rpm at 75-mph.

Overdrive ratio w/ 5-sp auto = .761:1
Stock final drive ratio is the typical: 3.727 (3.73)
For calculations I'm using a tire height of 33-in. A loaded tire may be 32.5-in. but it makes little difference in the numbers.

4.56 gears
In Overdrive:

@ 65 = 2160 rpm
@ 70 = 2327 rpm
@ 75 = 2493 rpm

4.88 gears

@ 65 = 2312 rpm
@ 70 = 2490 rpm
@ 75 = 2668 rpm

None of these RPM seem overly high to me, in fact the 4.56 rpm at 65-mph is a bit low and I wonder how well it will pull up hills in overdrive. The goal is to stay it overdrive as much as possible and not have to gear down to 4th or 3rd, at least at highways speeds, and to use small throttle openings. I'm a believer that less road speed (wind resistance) has a bigger impact on MPG than RPM. And when one increases their road speed to something like 75 the lower gears will buck the wind better than taller gears. Tall gears not being able to handle wind and even slight inclines is what I have now!

A couple years ago I re-geared my '05 Rubicon to 4.88s. That car had much less power, terrible aerodynamics and a 6-speed manual with a shorter/lower overdrive ratio. The shop that did the gears thought I was going too low, but I was not unhappy with the gearing. On the Jeep going to 4.88s made overdrive very close to where direct was with the stock 4.10s.

On the 4Runner with 4.88s @ 65-mph I will still be 200-rpm lower in overdrive than I am currently in 4th/direct @ 65. And possibly the most convincing argument for me in favor of 4.88s is that the engine rpm @ 65 will only be 400-rpm higher than it was when stock, 1900-rpm.

Arguments please.
 
Last edited:

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
I'm of the opinion that when deciding between two ratios go with the lower gearing (numerically higher). In your case, the 4.88. I've always thought the RPM/tire size tables don't adequately adjust for higher profile, extra weight (both sprung and unsprung), etc. that modified trucks have. The argument for keeping RPMs down on the highway seem hollow to me because a lifted and loaded truck should not be traveling at 80MPH+, it just isn't as safe as a stock truck. So IMO gearing for ~65MPH cruising speed made more sense, since that's more typically what I do. I see ~2100 RPM at 65MPH and think no way, but keep in mind I'm running a 130HP 22R-E... I'm happy to cruise at 2800RPM and my engine does not complain, so I'm very badly biased.
 

heeltoe989

Explorer
Well, I don't have a 4-runner, but I know I will be going to 4:56 with my truck, in saying that I made the choice for 4:56 because when I'm not loaded I like to cruise pretty good on the highway. We have some pretty good wind here on the highway too. I have the TRD SC and that made a huge difference in power and moving the truck. I get better mileage now with the SC, but I didn't want to sacrifice my top speed with going to 4.88 and I didn't want 4:10, because why bother. 4:56 seems to be the best daily driver and trail truck gear ratio for me.
 

ntsqd

Heretic Car Camper
My thinking for highway gearing is this:
Determine the RPM of the engine's Torque peak. This is the rpm that the engine is the most efficient at producing power (best BSFC).
Decide what speed you wish to run.
Decide what tire OD you wish to run.
Gear to operate at the engine speed for that tire size & road speed.

As Dave says, when in doubt or when the ideal falls between two available ratios, choose the lower (higher number) ratio.
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
Last edited:

slooowr6

Explorer
My take is from a different angle. How much noise different does 4.56 and 4.88 make? A 10 hr drive on freeway cabin noise will be a concern for me, I'm getting old and soft so don't laugh. On my taco I found the engine noise is quite different between 1900rpm and 2200rpm. 4 runner is a very quite truck with great ride so I'm guessing the engine noise difference will be more obvious. Try use 4th cruising at 2160rpm (4.56) and 2312rpm (4.88) and see if there is any noise difference.
 

jim65wagon

Well-known member
Redline said:
weighs 5,500 without passenger or a load, with passenger/load close to 6,000-lbs. Also tow a 200-lb AT Chaser occasionally.

Typical cruise speeds is 65-70-MPH. Can I and will I drive fast on occasion? Surely, but rarely for an extended distance and then I’m willing to sacrifice noise/mpg if needed

I live and travel at 5,000-ft and above, drive in the hills & mountains often, and we often have lots of wind.

On the 4Runner with 4.88s @ 65-mph I will still be 200-rpm lower in overdrive than I am currently in 4th/direct @ 65.

Sounds like a bad case of 4.88s to me. Everything you've stated leans toward the lower gear set. I don't think there woud be much difference in mileage at 65 between 4th gear now and the 4.88s in OD, and not much difference with the 4.56s either. The 4.88s will certainly be an asset towing that trailer up a mountain road, as well as help you crawl slower in 4lo. 4.88s if it were mine.
 

TheMike

Adventurer
My thoughts are to go 4.88's. As you build up your rig it will only get heavier and you will want the extra gearing. Closer you get to the peak power range the better off you'll be. A couple hundres RPM don't seem like much but the engine will work be working easier and you will see the difference.
 

tdesanto

Expedition Leader
Thanks for starting this thread James!

I've been watching this thread closely, as I'm considering going to 4.9's and adding lockers as well.

I think I would really benefit from the extra power off-road and towing the trailer up steep hills/climbs.

Right now, on the highway, I'm towing the trailer using 4th gear, same as you. With the new gears, I'd probably be able to use 5th (overdrive) more.

The service manager at my local Mitsu dealer suggested that the overdrive on an A/T is not really as strong as the lower gears (I think he meant in general and not just Mitsu specific) and should not really be used for towing.

If we go to the lower gears and start towing in overdrive, would the longevity of the A/T not be a concern?
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Tony:

He is correct regarding towing in overdrive (as a rule) but there are many variables. In our case we are talking about towing very light trailers, about 2000-lbs loaded. I currently use O/D when I can and will certainly after the re-gear.

tdesanto said:
I've been watching this thread closely, as I'm considering going to 4.9's and adding lockers as well.

I think I would really benefit from the extra power off-road and towing the trailer up steep hills/climbs.

Right now, on the highway, I'm towing the trailer using 4th gear, same as you. With the new gears, I'd probably be able to use 5th (overdrive) more.

The service manager at my local Mitsu dealer suggested that the overdrive on an A/T is not really as strong as the lower gears (I think he meant in general and not just Mitsu specific) and should not really be used for towing.

If we go to the lower gears and start towing in overdrive, would the longevity of the A/T not be a concern?
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Great input guys keep it coming!

Dave:

You are so right about the gearing tables. Altitude, terrain, and weight are not factored in, we have to do that ourselves and I think this is the difficult, more subjective part.

I don’t usually drive my trucks fast and I agree with your speed/safety comments in general, though the new 4Runners are pretty low and stable. Even after a 3-in lift it’s barely as tall as earlier 4Runners/trucks at stock height and it has a wider track. A very stable platform.

ntsqd:

I understand the ideas behind gearing for peak toque/brake specific fuel consumption, but I believe the rest of the story is that peak efficiency @ BSFC is at/near full-throttle. If one needs to move a maximum load up a hill you will likely have your “foot in it” and that is when operating at peak toque/BSFC is most important. With this example, either gears would put me near the peak torque (3200-rpm) if I shift down to 4th/direct. I surely don’t want to be spinning at 3200-rpm most of the time in overdrive, and the little V8 makes plenty of toque below 3200 (with less noise) to move the chassis in most circumstances (but not at 1700 in O/D).

slooowr6:

Good points about RPM noise. I have already downshifted a few times from 5th to 4th when traveling on the freeway to listen to the increased engine noise. Your right, the 4Runner is a quiet vehicle and the noise will be noticeable if I’m spinning too fast. I plan to do a noise/MPG test in 4th/direct with my current gears to see how it performs.

At 2670-rpm @ 75 w/4.88s there will certainly be lots more noise than now in O/D. At 75-mph road/wind noise starts to become more noticeable and it’s possible that the wind/tire noise will partially cancel out some of the added engine noise. And again, 75-mph is a higher speed for me to travel for a long distance.

jim65wagon:

4WD crawl ratio will be excellent with either ratio ☺. With 4.56 crawl ratio will be 41.187:1. With 4.88 it will be 44.077:1
Currently it’s 33.69:1, which is still pretty good for an auto trans.

The Mike:

Your correct in general about building a rig up and it getting heavier, though in my case I have already added armor, winch, etc, and the only things really remaining is traction and lighting, neither of which will add much. This is also why my 4Runner is so heavy, much heavier than many realize and often as heavy as other ‘larger’ vehicles that are not as outfitted.

Hit me with more comments guys, there has to be more people thinking 4.56 are better...

FYI, the gear guy (helpful) at JT in Washington yesterday said he has seen a tend that owners of newer 4x4s tend to be more conservative with gearing, not gearing as low, as people do when the trucks are a little older. I think that may be because when the rigs are older the modifications are more serious for harder trails, but that’s just my thinking. He also said he has a 2002 100LC with a 4-sp A/T with 4.88s. He had 35s now but had 33s before and thought it performed better before with the 4.88s and 33s. Surely it pulled better with the lower gears.

AND

Last night I talked to three gearhead buddies about the decision to go 4.56 or 4.88. Initially all of them thought 4.88s sounded too low. But as we talked and I gave them the RPM facts, they all thought I should go 4.88!

I really think the weight, mountains, and towing make a big difference in the discussion. There is no doubt that the lower gears will be much better towing. It’s how well it will pull when moving ‘empty’ and how loud the engine will be and if there will be a MPG hit if I go with the lower 4.88 instead of 4.56.

One more thing to consider in the toque-load/strength of the stock axles and if 4.88s will be just too much and increase the chance of breaking something. But the difference between the two is so small I’m not sure it’s anything to be concerned about.
 

slooowr6

Explorer
I would go with 4.56 if I'm going to re gear. The V6 with SC can stay in O/D locked go in up some passes at 65mph, only 2 times at the very end of a climb it slide out of O/D but I think it's still in 5th (can't be sure the rpm change from ~1900 to ~2200). Base on gearing table if I go 33" I need 4.11 to keep it the same as 30.5" with 3.73, let me know if I'm wrong. My truck is 6000lbs and has the aerodynamic of a brick with the camper on the back. Going to 4.56 is a jump from 4.11 so I'm guess it should boost the power enough.
 

heeltoe989

Explorer
slooowr6 said:
I would go with 4.56 if I'm going to re gear. The V6 with SC can stay in O/D locked go in up some passes at 65mph, only 2 times at the very end of a climb it slide out of O/D but I think it's still in 5th (can't be sure the rpm change from ~1900 to ~2200). Base on gearing table if I go 33" I need 4.11 to keep it the same as 30.5" with 3.73, let me know if I'm wrong. My truck is 6000lbs and has the aerodynamic of a brick with the camper on the back. Going to 4.56 is a jump from 4.11 so I'm guess it should boost the power enough.

I'm in the same boat and I think 4:56 will be plenty of gear for our trucks.
 

ntsqd

Heretic Car Camper
My dyno related BSFC experience has always been at WOT, but it is my understanding that regardless of throttle angle that best BSFC occurs at peak torque. This being due to peak torque always occurring at the RPM that the engine is breathing the most efficiently.
In my own experience with my Toyotas it is better to be a little under the peak torque RPM than to be a little over. Whether that translates across all brands I do not know. Though I suspect so.
 

kjp1969

Explorer
For what its worth, we tow a 5500lb. travel trailer all over Southern and Central California, including up over 8000' passes. I think our 2wd '04 Sequoia has the same engine and trans as yours. We have a totally stock drivetrain and tire size.

I always tow with the O/D off, which translates at 60-65mph to around 2800-3000 rpm. It sounds like it should be noisy and high strung, but it isn't. That engine is smooth and quiet and makes all of its useful torque between 3 and 4k, so its a good place to be under load.

That said, couldn't you just keep taller gears for unladen economy, and on long and slow climbs simply downshift? Might be simpler and more economical overall. I suppose that you're unladen far more often than laden, and you might keep the rev's low when you don't need them. The only time you would really appreciate the lower gears are on startoff from a dead stop while under load. At higher speeds with the trailer, a quick downshift would give you all the torque you need.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,219
Messages
2,914,494
Members
231,957
Latest member
lkretvix

Members online

Top