You are correct. The U.S. Consulate is in Benghazi and the embassy in Tripoli. Would you please explain using pacification instead of terrorism? My question is; How does the murder of a United States ambassador and 2 navy seals and one other not terrorism but pacification?
Not knowing all the facts I can only guess the first reports were closest to correct before spin-masters inject propaganda to sway opinion."
You question refers to what you call a murder which you then claim is terrorism IMHO it can't be both nor can it be either "for its an in kind response of killing who they perceive as the enemy"!
Pacification in military terms is the use of force including deadly to bring those targeted into submission of what is claimed to be peace and lately under the guise of some humanitarian effort. The resulting response from those who are targeted for pacification is to counter with their version of pacification "killing the enemy". It would be foolish to assume that any given enemy will not respond in kind to pacification efforts.
I don't live under a rock nor did I fall from a turnip truck; IMHO the over use of the term(s) murder/terrorism are a result of the propaganda machine creating a thought pattern that is not healthy and surely lacking in common sense.
The following observation has absolutely nothing ose to do with politics; IMHO recent/current legislative acts/efforts allowing for large segments of our own society not joining in lockstep nationalism to be labeled as terrorists or potential terrorist threats to the US according to the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and targeted for domestic pacification.
I suspect some herein will not like this especially those who were/are in the system but more insight into what is really going on and the resulting response from those opposed to global dominance, search "global dominance group" on the web.
