elcoyote said:
They are exactly that. They all come from the same factory, they all use the same hardware. We have tested the Open Sky, Rooftop Tent and another sample, unbadged, directly from the factory. The platforms, hardware, ladders and covers are identical. The fabrics are different. They are all entry level tents.
Good to know... I figured as much, but glad to have it confirmed. That being said, the ARB unit did seem to have a higher quality of build than that of the Mobasas I have seen? We had the two side by side, and while the new Mobasa is far better than the earlier unit, it still had its share of minor manufacturing flaws. The ARB didn't seem to have any though I havn't had a chance to really crawl all over it like I have the Mombasa. I was told ARB received an initial Simpson II unit to check out, they made note of several needed QC issues and addressed them for their production unit.
I would agree with the entry level tent, I think they likely rank along side with the Ezi-Awn Econo tents, while not meeting the quality that the Series 3 Ezi-Awns are constructed too. I havn't had more than a quick look at the AutoHome units, but they seem right up there with the Ezi-Awn units. Both killer units, a "get what you pay for" item for sure.
I really think these "entry level" tents are a good thing for the market, some may disagree right now... but I forsee many of those that have these entry level tents, stepping up to the top dollar units in the coming years, I know I will. And too boot, many of those same users might have never got into the "roof top tent bandwagon" had the low buck units not flooded the market. We will have to wait and see if my prediction comes true, but I think they will help propel the market as a whole.