Hackopotomus
Observer
I have a Chevy 2500 crew cab truck with a camper shell that I had intended to use as my overland rig but also need a pickup with an open bed for working on my small ranch. So instead of buying another truck I figured I'd pull the shell off and use the truck I already have and get a van instead.
I'm a 70's kind of guy and had a few custom vans back in the 70's and have been wanting to get another one. I love the ability to be able to just park somewhere and walk into the back without having to exit the vehicle.
So, been looking at 4x4 vans and ran across a Astro vans as well as full size. Not sure which direction to go.
The Astro van is smaller size so less restricted on tighter trails, can be had pretty cheaply, maybe better gas mileage?
Full size is bigger (duh!) so more room inside, bigger engine for more power but worse gas mileage?
It is just me and my dog so I don't really need the room but I think more space is always nice once you get parked up and move to the back. They stopped making Astro's in 2005 so finding a nice clean low mile one is hard while newer full size vans are much more common.
Gas mileage is not a huge concern as this will be only used on adventure trips but everyone wants to save where they can. Does anyone know what kind of mileage an Astro gets? How about a full size Chevy with a V8?
I'm in North West NV and I want to do a lot of trails around here but nothing too wild (I have a built Jeep for really rough stuff). If I get an Astro I'll probably do a small lift and tires. Not sure about full size as I see Quigley and Pathfinders that are already lifted but also stock factory 4x4 vans. Not sure what lifts are available for the factory 4x4. Do want to go too big, just enough for maybe 35's.
Any other considerations of an Astro vs full size?
I'm a 70's kind of guy and had a few custom vans back in the 70's and have been wanting to get another one. I love the ability to be able to just park somewhere and walk into the back without having to exit the vehicle.
So, been looking at 4x4 vans and ran across a Astro vans as well as full size. Not sure which direction to go.
The Astro van is smaller size so less restricted on tighter trails, can be had pretty cheaply, maybe better gas mileage?
Full size is bigger (duh!) so more room inside, bigger engine for more power but worse gas mileage?
It is just me and my dog so I don't really need the room but I think more space is always nice once you get parked up and move to the back. They stopped making Astro's in 2005 so finding a nice clean low mile one is hard while newer full size vans are much more common.
Gas mileage is not a huge concern as this will be only used on adventure trips but everyone wants to save where they can. Does anyone know what kind of mileage an Astro gets? How about a full size Chevy with a V8?
I'm in North West NV and I want to do a lot of trails around here but nothing too wild (I have a built Jeep for really rough stuff). If I get an Astro I'll probably do a small lift and tires. Not sure about full size as I see Quigley and Pathfinders that are already lifted but also stock factory 4x4 vans. Not sure what lifts are available for the factory 4x4. Do want to go too big, just enough for maybe 35's.
Any other considerations of an Astro vs full size?