Delivering the NPS gospel
Yep, the unleashed dog story and the campfire story squares totally with the stories flying around on the various forums. The one time I visited PI, a 5 day/4 night tent camping trip in May 1990, we camped about halfway between the ferry landing and Portsmouth Village. We saw the rangers make exactly one trip per day up to Ocracoke Inlet and back south. Not once did they stop us when we were on the beach nor did we ever see tracks suggesting they'd looked at our campsite while we were away. The stories about rough treatment began simultaneous to the Audubon lawsuit settlement. There was a ton of ill will expressed between the parties during the litigation and the NPS was stuck in the middle. When the settlement was announced, it's clear that the NPS received its marching orders from the Audubons as to the vigorous enforcement they must engage in.
It's a damned shame when a very small group of individuals succeed in having their own vision of "the one true way" to enjoy a public resource foisted upon the rest of the world, even though their way effectively excludes the great, great majority of others. The currently developing CLNS use plan calls for extensive "pedestrian-only" areas--on Portsmouth Island and Core Banks! Maybe there are more individuals seeking backpacking access than we think? More likely, it's just more "holier than thou" attitudes by those who believe baloney such as the mere sight of a dog may cause a piping plover to leave the Outer Banks forever. Give me a break.
But it sure looks as though we'd best get used to it, to a degree. NC state and local lawmaking bodies have had limited success in pushing back on some of the more absurd access limitations given their destructive effects on tourism, the lifeblood of the coastal economies. Hopefully that sort of pressure, plus that provided by individual efforts, will preclude the nuttier aspects of land use restrictions from being enacted at CLNS. The bottom line is that the NPS has completely gone back on its word, as expressed during the condemnation proceedings, where access and use are concerned. As a result, folks in Dare, Hyde, and Carteret Counties know a lot of how the Native Americans felt when they gave up their lands, only to have the rules change just a few years later. The same thing happened to NC's "hoi toiders", only 100 years later, and in a court of law rather than the business end of a Winchester.
Foy