M
MuddyOval
Guest
Pulling on one frame rail of a ladder-frame truck? I saw a P38 Range Rover destroyed by doing that.
It really is a combo of all of them, but it is mostly bending.Wait.. it's not shear or tension, but a bending load. Can you calculate the amount of bending force a bolt can take?
For some reason I missed the bridle part of that. If the receiver is mounted to a cross bar between the frame rails that is strong enough to take the strain, then I'd just use a receiver hitch. The ones on the Discovery, for example, are bolted to a crossmember.
As my earlier post said, the problem is that it might well not be strong enough. It's a long bar, designed to take towing loads, not a snatch pull right in the middle of it. If there's any chance of bending the pin, I'd say the bar is at much higher risk of bending!
Excellent point. I'd hardly figure on the pin being the weak link, especially on the rusty old receiver hitch setups hanging off the back of so many trucks.
Utilizing two points at once on even a straight recovery would seem to inject unnecessary forces acting on the frame into the mix, unless there was some really good reason in a particular instance to do otherwise. One solid point for a recovery ought to get the job done most of the time. I had two bolt-on D rings (like the type bolted/welded to trailers) positioned just outside of the frame rails on the bumper of my YJ years back, and actually deformed the bumper by using a chain Y to which I attached a ComeAlong when pulling out shrubs. The bumper was OEM, 3/16" bent sheet (formed into a C channel). ComeAlongs don't generate all that much force...using one point would have been a better idea by far, even for pulling shrubs!
In a perfect world, I'd like to see JATE rings on the frame rails, which seems like a slick deal. But Jeep didn't think that was a good idea, for some reason or another. However, it might make for a fun fabrication project.
BTW I've seen a manual specifically say not to recover using two points. The force pulls the frame rails together.
The army recovery manual says to use a spreader bar
Don't use JATE rings for harsh recovery. For a mild pull without using kinetic ropes, maybe... but they are meant to tie rigs down, rig for parachutes or sling them from a helicopter- not yank the bejeebus out of them.
I'm not saying they aren't stout, but the fact is that are only rated to 10,000lbs (or less depending on what source you refer to).I just haven't seen any cheesy Class III receivers, personally. Most tend to be really stout.
I couldn't find in the link you posted where is says not to use two points. I did find where it said to use both shackles if at all possible (first paragraph under "Winch Safety").BTW I've seen a manual specifically say not to recover using two points. The force pulls the frame rails together.
The army recovery manual says to use a spreader bar
When I was in the army, using Jate Rings or equivalent, with a (long) harness was SOP for any vehicle recoveries. Always use a double recovery point if possible. The long harness prevents any significant force pulling the frame rails together. There really is no downside to the harness method...
I'm not saying they aren't stout, but the fact is that are only rated to 10,000lbs (or less depending on what source you refer to).
I couldn't find in the link you posted where is says not to use two points. I did find where it said to use both shackles if at all possible (first paragraph under "Winch Safety").
In any case, a properly rigged bridle serves the purpose of a spreader bar, but is more versatile and, arguably, easier to stow.
I'm betting you were using a winch in a very controlled recovery- not putting a springy inertia strap on there and yanking the hell out of it. JATE rings are not rated for inertial recoveries. The bolts are smaller than the cross-pin on the previously debated hitches.