ntsqd
Heretic Car Camper
I'm accepting that it doesn't work, but the table analogy has stiff legs where a vehicle has springs in it's "legs", so it doesn't well describe the situation.
I think the reason it doesn't work is lack of force. Assuming (seems to be popular right now...) a 4" ID air spring at 30 psi there is a maximum lifting force of 377 pounds. I can see that not being enough to make much difference. If you ran that up to 100 psi then you'd have 1257 pounds of lifting force. That would probably do something.....
EDIT: Reading GT's post after starting this and then going to lunch I'm struck by one thing. The point of load bearing is where the spring(s) are anchored at the frame and on the control linkage, not where the linkage is anchored. If all the weight went to the linkage mount locations then there would be no weight to compress the springs. A Free Body Diagram of, say, a Taco's lower front control arm, is really quite interesting. Depending on exactly what the situation is the arm could be pushing up or pulling down on the frame at it's mounts.
I think the reason it doesn't work is lack of force. Assuming (seems to be popular right now...) a 4" ID air spring at 30 psi there is a maximum lifting force of 377 pounds. I can see that not being enough to make much difference. If you ran that up to 100 psi then you'd have 1257 pounds of lifting force. That would probably do something.....
EDIT: Reading GT's post after starting this and then going to lunch I'm struck by one thing. The point of load bearing is where the spring(s) are anchored at the frame and on the control linkage, not where the linkage is anchored. If all the weight went to the linkage mount locations then there would be no weight to compress the springs. A Free Body Diagram of, say, a Taco's lower front control arm, is really quite interesting. Depending on exactly what the situation is the arm could be pushing up or pulling down on the frame at it's mounts.
Last edited: