As overlanders we tend to enjoy traveling not for conquering the obstacles we encounter along the way, but for the beauty of the world we see and the destination we reach. I’m the first person to jump into my truck and tackle a difficult trail if it leads to a hidden camp spot, remote swimming hole, or ancient ruins; but when there is no purpose, no destination, or even enjoyment of the journey, are we any different from the teenager ramming his lifted truck through mud holes in a field?
So tackling a difficult trail is okay as long as there's a "valid" destination at the end... but tackling a trail just to go to the end of the trail means you're the same as a teen hitting the mud holes. Yeah can't see any bias there.