Newbie here - help me understand!

off-roader

Expedition Leader
The Gen II/II.5 are noticeable bigger and heavier than the Gen I Montero. The Gen II.5 is a very refined vehicle that makes for an excellent daily driver. While the Gen I looks great, it is not as trail capable, as durable or as comfortable as a Gen II/II.5. Personally I would look to get a Gen III Montero at this time. Many of the newer members are going with the Gen III Monteros and they are having great success. The Gen III is probably the best platform of the three for building an overlanding rig.

I do like the boxy look of the Gen I over all the other models. For simple overlanding, I'd choose the gen I any day.
The reality is, Overlanding isn't all that difficult for any model Montero in stock trim. If anything you may want to upgrade the tire size & possibly remove or re-enforce the stock side steps (if it came with them) but that's about all that needs to be done.

For more technical terrain (rock crawling, etc.) I'd take the mid 90's Gen II. SR trim with the locker and upgrade it appropriately as I'm doing with my 96SR.

HTH.
 

Imnosaint

Gone Microcamping
+1 on what's been said, with an endorsement on the Gen III. Being an avid follower back in the day of the Paris/Dakar when it actually went there, I became a fan of the Gen III, and, granted what remains factory in that competition is minimal, the performance and durability of the Gen III's platform won me over. I've owned two, my current one an '03 Limited. Surrendered the first one in a divorce.

Mitsubishi missed the marketing train on the Paris/Dakar victories, an opportunity to position the Montero nicely against British and other Japanese offerings, not to mention the big three's SUV inventory. Instead they focused on rice-burning AWD rally cars with Subaru in their sights. Not to mention Mitsu's almost devastating $0 $0 $0 campaign from which they're still recovering.

This not only made the Montero a wall flower, it squelched any incentive for aftermarket development for both the Sport and full-size platform, a good thing for folks like you in purchase price, and the bane for all of us looking to modify. Stock, the Montero already has a robust drive-train, some models with standard limited slip differential, and respectable nine-inch ground clearance. Outward visibility is terrific, rearward by comparison is great, and the cabin is well-appointed and thought out with one of the largest sunroofs offered.

Apparently Mitsu figured the American market would stick to Jeeps, leaving the Gen III Montero with plastic bumper caps and a departure angle rivaling UPS trucks. Aftermarket wheel offerings are limited given some models' air pressure sensors (as if, right?) and the V6 has a tendency to pressure oil through the rear main.

That said, all things being equal, I'd buy another.
 

MontyMcV

Observer
Gen I SWBs were Monteros and Dodge Raiders. The SWB also had 2.6L I4 engines through 87, and then 2.6 or 3.0 for 88 (89?) , all 89s I've seen were 3.0s. StarQuest 2.6 turbo I/Cs swap nicely into a SWB. Other markets got the 2.6 in the Gen I LWBs. And then there all the diesels that the US never saw...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,927
Messages
2,922,313
Members
233,083
Latest member
Off Road Vagabond
Top