I recently inspected this vehicle and was very impressed. I can hardly believe I decided not to buy it but logic finally prevailed and I told Ron that I would have to pass.
First, my reasons for not buying so that others can decide if these mean anything to them or not. I am 6'4" and have fairly broad and bony shoulders. Given the distance I have to put the seat back the roll cage is in contact with my left shoulder all the time, pushing it forward. It doesn't make for a pleasant driving experience and to make it more of an issue I'm just getting over a rotater cuff problem on that side. I've driven 110s before but, if memory serves they didn't have a cage (it was in Australia) or the cage was located in a different spot. Second, I have a great garage but almost no other place to park this vehicle and with the roof rack and all it wouldn't fit. In many ways this is the cheapest legitimate 110 in CA so, believe me, I considered removing the rack and trying to reconfigure the cage ... but it's also kind of a historic vehicle and once I did that my tendency to just keep "improving things" would take over.
So, I didn't buy it.
The following, however, might help someone else decide whether or not they might want it. So here it goes -- I spent a fair amount of time under it and poking around in the interior and under the hood. I am not Mr. Rust-O-Vision but it seemed very clean ... nothing to be concerned about whatsoever. Recognize that Rust-O-Vision or not I am a Southern Californian and have absolutely no tolerance for rot. It creeps me out. This truck looked very good. It's not showroom. It's been through Siberia fer Chrissake. But it's damn clean nonetheless!
Driving: It ran smoothly and well, the installation of the new 200tdi was done by Gord'n at Lamorna Garage in Seattle. I know him sightly and he does good work, the guru of the Northwest Rover mechanics. A 200tdi in a 110 is not powerful by American standards but compared, let's say, to either of the 2F Land Cruisers I have owned it was sprightly. It also compared very favorably to an FJ60 I just drove with a 2.8 Powerstroke installed. You might gear down as a hill arrives but I never felt I was driving the gutless wonder. It's an older vehicle design, I am constantly reminded that the new Ford V6 that is the economy engine in the 2011 Mustang makes about as much power as a 1965 Shelby GT-350 and puts that power to the pavement better (the car is probably heavier but that's another story), at least the 110 is a BIG vehicle that gets 25mpgs. The breaks were good and I was re-impressed with the handling of the Defenders. The previously mentioned FJ60 was downright scary on the freeway interchange curves at 60 mph (it had a roof rack and tent) but the Defender handles damn good for what it is. I said what we all know, that it was an older design, but it also has a pretty modern suspension compared with other trucks of the era. Basically, it goes where you point it, even at 60, while breaking.
On the downside, it's loud ... no surprises there. The auxiliary tank doesn't work, that should be a pretty cheap fix. The gearshift shakes a bit when 1st is engaged but the clutch hooks up nicely and there are no odd noises.
Ron has the DOT and EPA stickers. He has a good deal of the paperwork. The Registered Importer that was used to bring in the truck is (I believe) the oldest in California, that they are still in business suggests that they do their job correctly. I called another importer to ask a few questions about buying a gray market car and he told me that he believed he knew about the 110 I was interested in and that the vehicle was known, even on the East Coast as one of the very few from that era that was imported correctly.
I did not confirm that it was an actual Camel Trophy vehicle but I suspect that the first US owner didn't go through two plus years of trouble just to import a copy.
If anybody wants a second opinion about this Defender I'm ready and willing to help out.