Not looking to rain on any parade, and if a Ural meets the needs, have at it. I agree that they are very cool and worthy of consideration.
I would, however, point out that there are good used rigs available used that might have more overall usefulness. Urals are not light, don't have much fuel economy, they cruise about 55 mph, and they don't set records for reliability (the newer the better on this, which limits how "used" you might want to consider).
I've followed Urals since they were first imported; indeed, they were once sold at Costco next to the checkout counters for $4,999. I've had multiple hacks and test driven many Urals. I've always been tempted, but it's always become clear that there are better rigs for on pavement and better rigs for off pavement. And as the price is now into the five figures for even the cheapest models, carefully constructed used hacks are worth your consideration.
Just as one example of the point I'm making . . . my Yamaha FJ1200/California Sidecar rig will get better mileage, cruise at any double digit speed, reach triple digits, is likely more reliable, is more comfortable, and has no weird handling traits. It cost less than half the price of a new Ural.
And if you want something more trail-oriented, something based, as CoastalDefender suggested, on a KLR would be less money and easier to handle.
Like I say, if a Ural meets the needs best, have at it. Just be aware that alternatives exist, especially if you're not under pressure to get something quickly.