Currently when I go on multi-day excursions my philosophy is if I can’t fit it in my backpack, I don’t need it, easily said with a backpacking and 21 year military background. Now throw in the wife into the mix who now has decided that she is missing out on all the places that I travel. Her philosophy in a nut shell is that even a 5 star hotel doesn’t have all the accommodations that she would want, surprising coming from also an Army veteran but of 27 years. Thus the search for shelters to go along with either my existing M416 or a trailer that I am considering fabricating.
I started looking at everything that is out there and of course you have the RTT’s and locally in Utah we have Springbar Tents. Note: I currently do not own either one of them so my opinion is somewhat unbiased to a point. So my question is for a healthy debate, other than the RTT’s cool factor (definitely wins out there) what is it’s true advantage over a comparable ground tent because after everything that I’ve looked there are far less advatanges. What am I missing here???
Cost: RTT: ARB Simpson III (Version IIIC) Roof Top Tent is on average $1568.51 a comparable size spring bar tent (Springbar Campsite 3 Tent) is $469.95. For your weight considerations the advantage goes to the Spring Bar at only 48lbs to the RTT 175 lbs and that is considering a Springbar that is twice the floor room of the RTT.
The ease of set up definitive advantage goes to the RTT, especially in foul weather, then again I live in the second driest state in the union. Regarding ease of entrance by far the Spring Bar has the advantage, considering my personal situation would include a 2 year old, an escape artist Siberian Husky who needs to be enclosed at night and a dang newly acquired Paris Hilton dog.
Retain ability of heat advantage to Spring Bar, no matter what or how the RTT is insulated you still have air movement underneath it which will cause a cooling effect greater than a ground tent. As for security I don’t see an advantage over either, besides that security from what? That RTT isn’t going to stop a bear or cougar from getting to you if they want. That’s what they make fully custom M4’s for. lol
Susceptibility to wind by far the Spring bar has the advantage iIn the western deserts of Utah where you continually find yourself with trees no higher than 8’ or so, the small trees will create great wind blocks for the spring bar but not so much for the RTT. Weight distribution when collapsed the Springbar gets packed and thrown in the trailer at a lesser weight and much lower center of gravity thus not raising the COG as a RTT will.
As for replacement parts I’m not sure on the RTT, but a spring bar I make a 10 mile trip and get my part. As for head room the comparison isn’t even remotely close, the spring bar wins at 75” nearly 50% more head room than the RTT, big factor when you are 6’3”.
So what is it that everyone appears to favor the RTT’s as opposed to a ground tent when it comes to outfitting your expedition trailer? What am I missing here?
I started looking at everything that is out there and of course you have the RTT’s and locally in Utah we have Springbar Tents. Note: I currently do not own either one of them so my opinion is somewhat unbiased to a point. So my question is for a healthy debate, other than the RTT’s cool factor (definitely wins out there) what is it’s true advantage over a comparable ground tent because after everything that I’ve looked there are far less advatanges. What am I missing here???
Cost: RTT: ARB Simpson III (Version IIIC) Roof Top Tent is on average $1568.51 a comparable size spring bar tent (Springbar Campsite 3 Tent) is $469.95. For your weight considerations the advantage goes to the Spring Bar at only 48lbs to the RTT 175 lbs and that is considering a Springbar that is twice the floor room of the RTT.
The ease of set up definitive advantage goes to the RTT, especially in foul weather, then again I live in the second driest state in the union. Regarding ease of entrance by far the Spring Bar has the advantage, considering my personal situation would include a 2 year old, an escape artist Siberian Husky who needs to be enclosed at night and a dang newly acquired Paris Hilton dog.
Retain ability of heat advantage to Spring Bar, no matter what or how the RTT is insulated you still have air movement underneath it which will cause a cooling effect greater than a ground tent. As for security I don’t see an advantage over either, besides that security from what? That RTT isn’t going to stop a bear or cougar from getting to you if they want. That’s what they make fully custom M4’s for. lol
Susceptibility to wind by far the Spring bar has the advantage iIn the western deserts of Utah where you continually find yourself with trees no higher than 8’ or so, the small trees will create great wind blocks for the spring bar but not so much for the RTT. Weight distribution when collapsed the Springbar gets packed and thrown in the trailer at a lesser weight and much lower center of gravity thus not raising the COG as a RTT will.
As for replacement parts I’m not sure on the RTT, but a spring bar I make a 10 mile trip and get my part. As for head room the comparison isn’t even remotely close, the spring bar wins at 75” nearly 50% more head room than the RTT, big factor when you are 6’3”.
So what is it that everyone appears to favor the RTT’s as opposed to a ground tent when it comes to outfitting your expedition trailer? What am I missing here?