It's the heavier version Identical to yours I believe.
I'll be mounting a lot of "stuff" on the truck's rack considering it's mostly people hauling duty inside. The 110's siblings in 90" and 100" lengths are extremely front light, even the 110 seems that way but it's length of wheelbase helps to hide it.
I'm kind of approaching the resolution to this imbalance in the opposite manner than what migh be considered conventional wisdom by using a a lighter spring in the rear and a heavier one in the front. Mainly because of the people hauler designation.
I plan to add more weight to the front of the truck than to the back . A Winch of course, the tent up top will be forward on the rack, I'm even thinking that I'll extend the rack forward of the windscreen a foot or so. This moves the weight even further forward and allows more gear on the roof, I think I'd rather be top heavy towards the front where I can feel it's effects more sooner than later on an obstacle. Hopefully this will offset the low (down) weight in the rear (extra fuel and water behind the rear tires)
Additionally all those things below the roofline and behind the driver are variable, fewer people less fuel and water in the tanks(by consumption). That weight could be as much as 600 pounds if you add the dogs. 600 pounds of moving, sloshing, panting, complaining. That may have to get out when the driver decides he might roll the truck on a sidehill.
What about that variable weight behind the driver, loaded is the truck going to look like a tail dragger when it's loaded with people dogs fuel and water? I hope not. I've got plans about replacing that crazy Boge self leveling unit at the rear axle (which is still working) with an air bag. The idea is that if I can keep the front stable and heavy (ish) I can run with the lighter rear springs to have a nice ride when unloaded and adjust it up when loaded. Of course we'll make it automatic (but simple)
Hah!! Bet you won't ask a simple question again!!!!
