Yes, the bends are way too tight, and that close to the opening eliminates any chance of "Ram air". The airflow backs up right at the throat and spills back out the opening. It's true that there's nothing wrong with a 90° turn as long as you design it properly. But in this case, the radius is too short, and I doubt they calculated the flow and determined the proper intake duct size. They just made it look right. And the Mantec really isn't any bettery in this regard. Sure, it doesn't have a bend per se, but it still has that hood thing which isn't aerodynamic either.
In any case, none of this matters. The airflow through the snorkel has a negligible effect, positive or negative, forwards or backwards. These are not high performance engines by any stretch of the imagination. And the evolution of Dakar trucks shows that the minor reduction in airpressure from a backwards facing intake is more than made up for by the reduction in dust ingestion. And that's on a race that only lasts a few thousand miles. On an overland truck with a lifespan of more than 100,000 miles, and you're not even racing... turn it backwards in dusty conditions. It's a no-brainer.