PlethoraOfGuns
Adventurer
Oh, the good ole' days with steel transfer cases and gears...
Yeah I guess I should have said that they should remain fairly still. To be honest I never liked that system, it relies on torque generated by the wheels taking the path of least resistance, which as you found out isn't always the one the engineers intended. Still tho, it takes quite a bit of power to rotate the driveshaft via the ring and pinion, which is why I find it concerning that your front driveline was spinning at such high speed. It still sucks that you had to deal with all that carnage, but I'm thinking it's not normal and there is something else that could be the cause of it. Just trying to save you some future aggravation is all...
This may be a dumb idea, but how about taping a phone to the frame rail nice and good, then going for a faster drive? Then you can play with the different modes of the 4x4 (2wd, Auto, and 4hi) and see exactly what the driveshaft does in each of them? I'd imagine this will be more productive as the GM frames tend to hide the front driveshaft quite well, so I'm not sure how much you'll be able to see of it while just walking next to the truck with someone else driving it.
That said, crap does happen. And u-joints on the front do wear out, and you get a nice squeak and a vibration... usually. Which 90% of people ignore until it fails catastrophically. Not saying the OP ignored obvious signs, just saying everyone needs to be aware that a repetitive squeak or new vibration is cause to start checking things out.
My 2006 2500 (with CAD) has 214k on it and I've never replaced a u-joint. No pump rub either. These trucks aren't junk, but metal parts do occasionally fail. Be interesting to see the offending parts... Were the caps dry, if the u-joint broke, was the break partially rusty, were there any inclusions in the forging, etc. There is a REASON it broke, and that reason isn't that GM designed a "stoopid" t-case. (Actually, Chevy just buys the T-case, and the design is either Borg Warner or New Venture Gear)
Well, for the record Ford has been using magnesium transfer cases since the late 80s. They are not weak by any means, actually it's quite amazing what kind of abuse they can tolerate provided they remain lubricated thru the ordeal.
The type of failure you experienced is something that no t-case can be designed to handle, and typically it would never come to it in the first place as the driveshaft will vibrate quite noticeably well before the bearing lets go. This should have been caught early on while the U-joint was still wearing out, your front end issue masked it - no fault of your own there, it was a pure coincidence.
You as an owner and operator of the truck actually did your part by noticing the vibration afterwards and bringing it up with GM Service.
And this is who failed you, it wasn't the engineers who designed the t-case, but rather the "techs" who were supposed to service the truck. If you want to place blame place it on the untrained monkey who missed the loose U-joint - idk what they got taught in "tech" school, or how hard their boss hawked them to turn and burn, but that driveshaft should have been removed from the truck and then any U-joint issues would have become apparent... So basically, you got screwed by someone who was supposed to help you. Any chance you could stick the dealership with the repair bill?
That sucks about your transfer case. I wonder why the driveshaft is spinning when not in 4wd. If the diff actuator is working correctly the driver side axle should just be spinning the spider gears in the diff.
When I was doing research on the GMT800 platform the biggest deficiencies I noted were the 4wd system (electronic diff actuator, pump-rub issues, and electronic t-case shifter) and the steering.
That is why I have a 32 spline NP241 in my garage waiting to be rebuilt. I'm also going to install a GMT800 floor shifter (the center console must be trimmed) and a posi-lok in the front diff to completely delete the electronic 4wd system. I have a 2003 Yukon XL 8.1L and the one time I took it off road so far (I'm building it up now) the diff actuator decided to take a nap and I got stuck in sand on the beach. Can't wait to throw out my autotrac case and electric diff actuator.
Well, I'm glad you got your truck fixed. I'm going to second what Underdrive said, and add a bit of engineering insight... Well, I'm an engineer, so it'll probably be more information than you wanted... This insight is based on my experience from 20 years in the auto industry, mostly working with 4wd systems. I do not wish to offend or start a pissing contest, only to provide useful information.
First, and very importantly, cast magnesium is NOT soft. At it's worst, it is very comparable to cast aluminum, but usually it's slightly harder and a little stronger. It is also lighter, which is EXACTLY why it's used instead of cast aluminum or iron. It certainly didn't mask any failure by "absorbing vibrations"... Not anymore than an aluminum or iron case would have, anyway. The t-case being of magnesium instead of aluminum or even iron was NOT your problem, and the material of the housing likely didn't contribute AT ALL to the failure you experienced.
I've seen similar failures in Jeeps (with aluminum t-case housings!) so I'd bet my dog (and I do love her dearly!) that your failure was due to one of two things... Either a really bad u-joint let go at road speed, causing much carnage, or more likely, you had a bad bearing/seal on the front bearing of the t-case, which would have allowed all the fluid to leak out (The seals won't last at all if the bearing is even just a little bad...) and thus your t-case was eventually (and likely fairly quickly) REALLY low on fluid. Chain drive t-cases won't go 100 miles once the fluid is gone before they pretty much grenade, and it doesn't matter who made them, or what they're made of. With no fluid, the chain stretches, and then piles up between the bottom sprocket and the housing, and BANG. Busted case, u-joints, driveshaft, wiring, fuel lines, etc... Basically big mess...
Definitely sucks for you, and anyone else it might happen to, but it's REALLY uncommon, and piling on to GM for using magnesium is pretty far off base. Your failure was, one way or another, crappy timing, or a missed maintenance issue. I'm not saying it's your fault at all, and as Underdrive pointed out, if the U-joint or seal was bad, and a dealer or other mechanic missed it, you should at least let them know you won't be coming back to their business. Ever.
As for the spinning front driveshaft, the CAD actuator slides a splined collar that engages the right half shaft. Because it's just splines, it cannot engage until the driveshaft is spun up by the t-case. So when you hit the auto button from 2wd, the process is: Clutches in the t-case spin up the front driveshaft to road speed (on an older truck, you usually hear a "thump" if you're going faster than 45mph or so), CAD actuator gets power and runs its motor to slide a splined collar and connect the right half shaft into one piece, t-case disengages clutches and begins monitoring for slip. If you shift to 4wd instead of auto, it just leaves the t-case clutch engaged. In a truck that doesn't have auto, or with a manual shifter on the floor, there is a synchronizer in the t-case just like in a manual trans that spins up the front driveline so it can engage 4wd. Once the t-case is in 4wd, the CAD actuator is energized to engage the front axle. The CAD engages best when you're actually moving. At a stop it may not engage at all if the splines collide instead of line up. That's why you should engage 4wd before you need it while you're still moving, or at least rock the vehicle GENTLY a few times if stopped to ensure full engagement of the splines before you resort to "a whole lot of flooring" to extricate yourself. A partially engaged CAD can strip splines, and then it's big money to fix!
The CAD is fairly slow to disengage if you're moving, as drag makes it hard to slide the splined collar, and it's only disengaged by a light spring. So, if you engage, then dis-engage, but then re-engage right away, the CAD doesn't have time to actually dis-engage, and the t-case can see that it's already spinning at speed, so the process is pretty much done already. (Much faster than starting the process with the CAD disengaged.)
As for reliability, it is my experience that the CAD actuator on the ~'98+ 400 and all 800/900 series trucks is hardly EVER the issue. The old style (~'97 down) heated gas chamber unit on 400 trucks was known to have issues though, particularly in cold climates, or on older trucks. There is a retrofit kit to use the motor driven unit on older trucks that I HIGHLY recommend if you have an older 400 series truck. There is also a solid billet unit that will just keep it engaged all the time. Good for ranch trucks, snow plowing, etc, but probably not for full time daily driver use.
Installing a Posi-Lock in place of the electric CAD does make it a manual process, and allows you to just leave the front engaged, or leave it dis-engaged for 2wd low if you need low speed to maneuver, but don't want the binding that happens in 4wd. (Useful for backing trailers) In 2wd, the Posi-lock can ONLY be engaged if you are stopped. You can engage on the fly by shifting to 4wd first, then engaging the Posi-lock.
As for the driveline spinning, in 2wd, the driveshaft is spun only by the friction/oil drag that's in the front differential and t-case, not by any mechanical means. (Just like on any older 4wd truck, even with true lockout hubs...) The ones I've watched on chassis rolls start spinning at about 25mph, and spin fairly slowly at pretty much all speeds. It may spin a bit more with the "auto" t-case, as the clutches also add some to the rotation, particularly on a new t-case, which is what you have now... it'll slow as you get some miles on the t-case and the clutches loosen up. Regardless of the speed, since there's no load, there's relatively little wear anywhere, and on the plus side, it serves to keep u-joints, seals, and differential parts oiled up and moving freely for people who seldom engage 4wd.
Lastly, the most common problem with any electric shift t-case is that people NEVER use it, then expect it to work once in a blue moon. I recommend that you cycle through all the shift positions a few times once a month. Mostly, this keeps the range sensor in the actuator working, so the shift controller knows what range it's shifted to. As the grease in the range sensor gets old, it can get a little stiff and cause an intermittent contact, which results in the t-case not knowing what range it has entered. Usually shifting it several times will get it working again, but using it occasionally will also keep the grease spread out, and provide you with trouble free operation. NEVER using it will almost certainly result in disappointment when you actually need it to work... (Read into the sinking of the Bounty for a good example of how not using equipment to keep it "fresh" is a terrible way to ensure it'll work when you need it...)
Whew. My fingers hurt... I hope everyone finds this information to be helpful, and not hurtful, as that's how I meant it... And hopefully my facts (and experience based opinions) are not too offensive.
And as usual, Your Mileage May Vary...
Chris
We know of a 1-ton truck with a windshield banner that reads "Can't shift this!" (MC Hammer's "Can't touch this" anyone?) - it's got a manual trans with the factory shift knob replaced by a Road Ranger shift valve with a "range" paddle and a "splitter" slider and an aftermarket lower cover sleeve allowing installation of an electric rocker switchI'm not a fan of these 4wd actuators. When I ordered mine and declined the dash activated 4wd the fleet guy said "really"?