Antichrist
Expedition Leader
9.00x16 Co-op Grip Spur available at your local farmers cooperative. Approximately 36" OD
Actually, if it were possible for it to hold the weight/stress sufficiently, yes. The thing with narrow tires is that it increases the PSI (pounds per square inch) on the contact pattern. Think about a wide tire having a contact of maybe 12 inches wide by 2 inches long, that's 24 square inches to spread out your (lets say you have 2000 pounds sitting on each tire) weight on. Then put that on a 2 inch wide by 2 inch long contact pattern, that's only 4 inches to spread out the weight on. Without doing any big math, you can see that the PSI in the latter case is 6 times more!
Also, for places like sand or shallow snow, think "pizza cutter", with the high PSI it sinks right to the "hard" ground/surface/road underneath.
Yes, narrow tall tires look absolutely horrible, but function better.
:drool: Now those are some neat looking tires...9.00x16 Co-op Grip Spur available at your local farmers cooperative. Approximately 36" OD
![]()
That looks like a relabled buckshot mudder! Simple and effective.9.00x16 Co-op Grip Spur available at your local farmers cooperative. Approximately 36" OD
![]()
I am sorry but I must disagree it totally depends on your vehicle and driving terrain. Google may have it right but my right foot on the gas will always tell me wider is better. If you are talking about a small tacoma okay but a rig loaded with gear I just don't buy it. I would run 9.50 on my jeep but it weighs 3000lb about 1/3 of my truck.
Seems like another thread is going on with just this debate. If anyone made a 2" wide tire, of course the PPSI is going to be higher but that tire would be useless. You have to be able to grab a hold to the surface without just cutting it like a skill saw.
I don't know. I do know that they have been around a long time. I bought a set of 7.00x15's for my '62 in 1975, give or take.That looks like a relabled buckshot mudder! Simple and effective.
Actually, if it were possible for it to hold the weight/stress sufficiently, yes. The thing with narrow tires is that it increases the PSI (pounds per square inch) on the contact pattern. Think about a wide tire having a contact of maybe 12 inches wide by 2 inches long, that's 24 square inches to spread out your (lets say you have 2000 pounds sitting on each tire) weight on. Then put that on a 2 inch wide by 2 inch long contact pattern, that's only 4 inches to spread out the weight on. Without doing any big math, you can see that the PSI in the latter case is 6 times more!
:drool: Now those are some neat looking tires...
And for the guy who thinks wide tiores are better... If so, why do Tractors run tall skinny tires??? Yes, for YOU in deep sand wide tires have their advantages... BUT in nearly EVERY SINGLE other terrain (outside of deep mud and snow) the tall skinny tires will go farther adn handle better.
Cheers
Dave
Originally Posted by bat
Quote:
Originally Posted by jh504
Seems like another thread is going on with just this debate. If anyone made a 2" wide tire, of course the PPSI is going to be higher but that tire would be useless. You have to be able to grab a hold to the surface without just cutting it like a skill saw.
I have never seen rubber cut through rock, have you?
:drool:
And for the guy who thinks wide tiores are better... If so, why do Tractors run tall skinny tires???
Cheers
Dave