DividingCreek
Explorer
Two more years and we will be able to legaly bring in the first of the Tdi discos (89 model year). They will most likely be parts donors for a whole wave of disco conversions here.
Because not everything comes down to a question of dollar value. Some people build their trucks to USE them, not to sell them once the "build" is done. And if the conversion makes sense for an owner, that's his call, and his coin.
Why not just start with a Defender? Because Discoveries and Rangies have many advantages over Defenders. Defenders have a lot of good qualities. But comfort, NVH, etc are not one of them. Many people put a lot of value in being warm, dry, and holding a conversation with your passengers. If the disadvantage is that you can't take your body apart with a screwdriver, that's a fair trade-off for many people.
What have you driven other than Rovers? The V8 is a DOG. The most powerful version makes a paltry 217hp from 4.6L. In the 90's, the 4.0 produced 190 hp, meanwhile GM was putting the 5.7L in trucks with 255hp, more torque, and better fuel economy to boot. Even GM's base model full-size truck engine, the 4.3L V6 was putting out 200hp and more torque.
And then that same engine was offered as the large engine in lightweight compact trucks that would blow the doors off a Rover. (190hp 4500lb vs. 180hp 3000lb)
Where are you getting your prices? You can get a 300 with a swap kit for $3800 used, $5800 rebuilt, delivered. The R380 is another $1200 used, $1750 rebuilt. 300's can be bought used on Ebay.uk for about $1000. You just need to figure out shipping, which is not insurmountable if you have the right contacts. I was offered a complete running 300 with an R380, delivered in Canada, for $4500.
Let's not forget the amount of money many "casual" Rover people spend on non-powerplant modifications. Basic F+R lockers, axles, armor, roof rack, winch + bumper, suspension, etc., -- even without going crazy -- and plus labor since we're counting labor on the TDI swap, will see numbers pretty close to the diesel swap. And these mods are certainly not raising the intrinsic value of your D1/D2 more or less than a TDI will.
Of course if you had a TDI you'd want those mods too but there is a recurring theme that a diesel conversion "isn't worth it" and that you won't see a financial benefit.
You're not going to see a financial benefit with the first $5,000-$10,000 worth of modifications you purchased so why is the motor swap's financial viability suddenly in question? Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be pedantic, but the idea that the $X,XXX spent on a diesel conversion is somehow less well spent than the $X,XXX on OME/ARB/BFG/Warn/Engel stuff is a bit incongruous, isn't it?
I, nor I dont believe anyone else, has made the claim that the bolt on mods increase a trucks value either. That argument doesnt fly. Correct me if I am wrong, but from what I have read, engine conversions are typically done when there is a need for a new engine or substantial repair. The bolt on mods dont have anything to do with keeping the truck running. My point, and others too, is that if you have to change the engine out, in the US it is more economical to stick with the V8 for the reasons already previously in this thread.
If fuel cost were less than $2 a gallon, it may change the decision. However, in order to get <$2/gallon people are going to have to figure out how to source wvo, or someother bio deisel (if there are others). I would suggest 99.5% of the people doing diesel conversions are buying their fuel at the diesel pump (in the $4/gallon range + or _ $0.25).