His choice makes perfect sense to me. Of course, I am a bit bias. The four door was created for one thing and that was to appeal to the average family buyer. The extra doors and wheel base are to haul passengers, period. If you, me, or Tom are traveling solo then the two door is a lot better choice overall. I do not see where this overlander will be climbing any extremely steep slopes; the only area where the 4dr excels off road vs. the 2 dr.
I think most of us would agree the minimalist approach is the best when doing serious overlanding or we would all be buying RVs. In 2008, when I was looking to buy a jeep I debated going for the 4 dr or 2 dr for a while. At the time the price difference was only $2K not enough to be a consideration. It came down to the purpose of the vic. I had my road machines (crew cabs, long wheel base, 4x4s) and what I needed was a vic for the woods that would carry me and my kids, be road legal, and work as a third or fourth vic when needed.
In a 2 dr with the rear seat removed there is plenty room for cargo to support a several week mission. Actually, my preference is the rear seat out and just one co-pilot, agile and mobile is the name of the game here. Why would you pay more money and have a less capable off-road vic to have room you do not need?? This, as was quoted early, is why the 2 dr is the better choice for Tom or any overlander not looking to sleep in their vic. Of course, it is impossible to go around the world without having a vic you can sleep in; no one and I mean no one uses a motorcycle for that!!!! :bike_rider: