Why are Sequoia's not included?

Jbock220

New member
The Toyota Sequoia is a great platform. There are a few off us looking for resources, but they're scattered in other vehicle's forums. Can expedition portal add Sequoia to the Toyota forum title?
 
The entire Tundra platform is left out, but this is where we still post. Just like how the full size domestic section leaves out Dodge, its just a name. Technically we could post in the full size domestic since we are built in the good ol' USA ;)
 
Sales of Sequoias:

Calendar year US
2000 9,925[10]
2001 68,574[10]
2002 70,187[11]
2003 67,067[11]
2004 58,114[12]
2005 45,904[12]
2006 34,315[13]
2007 23,273[13]
2008 30,693[14]
2009 16,387[citation needed]
2010 13,848[citation needed]
2011 13,022[15]
2012 13,151[15]
2013 13,811[16]
2014 11,806[17]
2015 12,583[18]

Sales of Tacomas:

2000 147,295[37]
2001 161,983[citation needed]
2002 151,960[38]
2003 154,154[39]
2004 152,932[39]
2005 168,831[40]
2006 178,351[41]
2007 173,238[citation needed]
2008 144,655[42]
2009 111,824[43]
2010 106,198[44]
2011 110,705[44]
2012 141,365[45]
2013 159,485[46]
2014 155,041[47]
2015 179,562[48]

my guess, it's all about the numbers sold...
 

blackwood

Adventurer
The entire Tundra platform is left out, but this is where we still post. Just like how the full size domestic section leaves out Dodge, its just a name. Technically we could post in the full size domestic since we are built in the good ol' USA ;)

Being lumped in with the domestics? I just puked a little :drool:
 

MaverickTRD

Adventurer
If the section title included every toyota platform the title would be rows and rows long. Most know to simply post in this section
 

Retired Tanker

Explorer
If the section title included every toyota platform the title would be rows and rows long. Most know to simply post in this section


I doubt anyone will be complaining about the omission of the Camry, Corolla, etc.

But adding the Tundra and Sequoia seems (to me) to be a reasonable request. Hell, I've taken more time writing this post than it would take to edit the HTML to add them.
 

calicamper

Expedition Leader
Sales of Sequoias:

Calendar year US
2000 9,925[10]
2001 68,574[10]
2002 70,187[11]
2003 67,067[11]
2004 58,114[12]
2005 45,904[12]
2006 34,315[13]
2007 23,273[13]
2008 30,693[14]
2009 16,387[citation needed]
2010 13,848[citation needed]
2011 13,022[15]
2012 13,151[15]
2013 13,811[16]
2014 11,806[17]
2015 12,583[18]

Sales of Tacomas:

2000 147,295[37]
2001 161,983[citation needed]
2002 151,960[38]
2003 154,154[39]
2004 152,932[39]
2005 168,831[40]
2006 178,351[41]
2007 173,238[citation needed]
2008 144,655[42]
2009 111,824[43]
2010 106,198[44]
2011 110,705[44]
2012 141,365[45]
2013 159,485[46]
2014 155,041[47]
2015 179,562[48]

my guess, it's all about the numbers sold...

Still way more than Rover products shipped over in a couple of containers once a year. ;-)
 

bkg

Explorer
Post away, this is the right spot.

Amen. Adding more sub forums begets adding more sub forums... And then people getting annoyed that "there isn't anything new in the forum."

Just post here like every other sequoia/tundra owner does w/o complaint.
 

JLee

Adventurer
Amen. Adding more sub forums begets adding more sub forums... And then people getting annoyed that "there isn't anything new in the forum."

Just post here like every other sequoia/tundra owner does w/o complaint.

Yep. GX460, GX470...it'd be splintered.
 

GTV

Active member
Sales of Sequoias:

Calendar year US
2000 9,925[10]
2001 68,574[10]
2002 70,187[11]
2003 67,067[11]
2004 58,114[12]
2005 45,904[12]
2006 34,315[13]
2007 23,273[13]


2008 30,693[14]
2009 16,387[citation needed]
2010 13,848[citation needed]
2011 13,022[15]
2012 13,151[15]
2013 13,811[16]
2014 11,806[17]
2015 12,583[18]

I had to separate the two so you can see what the difference in sales was between first and second gen... Looks like people preferred the first gen by a LOT. I then considered that the sales of the 2nd gen Tundra (which the Sequoia is based on) must be much higher than that of the first gen, so I looked it up and did the maths. Roughly 110k a year on the first gen, 115k on the second gen. Not much!

Sorry to get off track, I just wish they kept building Tundra's and Sequoia's that were the same size as the first gen. The size of the first gen is perfect, IMO.
 

Retired Tanker

Explorer
I had to separate the two so you can see what the difference in sales was between first and second gen... Looks like people preferred the first gen by a LOT. I then considered that the sales of the 2nd gen Tundra (which the Sequoia is based on) must be much higher than that of the first gen, so I looked it up and did the maths. Roughly 110k a year on the first gen, 115k on the second gen. Not much!

Sorry to get off track, I just wish they kept building Tundra's and Sequoia's that were the same size as the first gen. The size of the first gen is perfect, IMO.

I'm pretty sure the Toyota marketing department would agree that the economy probably affected the drop in sales, as well.
 

Hutch434

Observer
I had a 2007 first gen up until a few months ago, and now have a 2008 Second gen.

Considering the aftermarket support for the first gen, I totally understand the lack of forum support.

If anyone has specific 1st or 2nd Gen Sequoia questions, I'd be glad to help!! shoot me a message.

- Hutch
 

Forum statistics

Threads
186,160
Messages
2,882,700
Members
225,984
Latest member
taunger
Top