Exaggerate much?
It was a couple of minutes of teeth pulling, and that included some dialog about it from team members. Was that too much? Some would say yes, others said it was the
"best episode to date" (including Season 1) and didn't have any angst about the tooth scenes. It's naive to think any production is going to please all, Clay and team are doing their best to present the story we had and make an entertaining and compelling video, I'm optimistic it's working based on viewership numbers (see my earlier reply for notes on that, episodes are gaining approx. 10k views each week), months ahead of S1 numbers. I'm participating in similar threads in a dozen different places, oddly ExPo is more fixated on the puking and teeth than all others combined? To be fair this thread is the most active thread on the subject outside of YouTube comments themselves.
I believe I was one of those that said this was the best episode to date. :sombrero:
However, you're missing two points. First, those who just say 'great trip/best ever/if you don't like it, don't watch/people should stop complaining/go do it yourself if you think you can do it better/etc...' will watch whatever end product you end up putting out. Ever been involved in focus groups? They are the equivalent of the people that show up to a focus group and are fine with everything. They are easy to please as the bar they set is based on their own bar's level. They are the people that gave you the Chevy Cavalier when Honda gave us the Civic. The editors, like the product planners at Chevy, can either listen to the guys that think everything is great or listen to those that feel the product can be improved and give us the current gen Cruze. You said ExPo has the biggest number of feedback, IMO that's because we're you're focus group
and we're you're biggest target market - not just in terms of audience, but in terms of then generating sales of the products by the companies you are sponsored. The second is not the '5 min' but the fact that even when you get some feedback (the YouTube comments seem to mimic the ones here in terms of type and frequency) you guys keep delivering the same thing, ie: things a lot of people would rather not watch. Here's what I'm getting at: The 'I love it' group will watch whatever it is you put out, the rest of us are hoping for a bit more... before we turn the channel. So why not put in more driving sequences and less eating/puking/teeth pulling. It's a win-win!
We know you have no control over any of this, and clearly no one is blaming/pointing fingers, but since no one else from the OE team participates in this thread, we hope the feedback makes it back to those that do.
I can think of a handful of reasons, perhaps they didn't have production worthy audio, it lasted 30 minutes or more so it would take the entire episode which I can assure you would have garnered more complaints, etc. Perhaps the production team didn't feel it added much to the overall story? I'm torn on how and to what depth to answer future questions and comments here on ExPo as it seems some background just opens things up to more shall we say "input"

I'm not hear to argue or defend, I'd love for everyone to enjoy the show and hope through my commentary I can help that happen.
It didn't need to encompass all 25 minutes of the episode. That portion,
as it was edited, was clearly portrayed as an uncomfortable car ride. Why not use that same amount of time and show us the funny parts?