I keep reading about how heavy the Northstar campers are relative to the FWC yet when I compare features and weights, the difference is much less than expected.
The Northstar MC600 has a dry weight of 1148 lbs which INCLUDES the jacks, 3-way frig, 16k Btu furnace, power converter, 20# propane tank, Fantastic fan, fire extinguisher, etc. The Northstar also includes underbed storage which is SO nice.
Here's what I get when I add everything up for the comparable FWC Fleet:
Shell - 845 lbs
Auxiliary battery system - 53
FanTastic Fan - 8
Interior lights - 3
Furnace - 25 (not sure how many Btu)
Steel Jack Brackets - 4
Camper jacks - 100
2 cu ft 3-way frig - 40
Total = 1078
That's a difference in weight of "only" 70 lbs. The one comparative I am not sure of, however, is the auxiliary battery system. I'm not quite sure what that is. If it includes a battery, then I have to subtract that from the Fleet total for a final difference of 123 lbs. That's not insignificant on a Tacoma, but not as big a difference as I expected given all the hype.
Obviously, you don't have to get all those things with a custom FWC build so you can lighten your load.
The Northstar is wood framed and the FWC is aluminum. Wood can obviously rot if exposed to moisture but in a dry climate like here in Colorado, I'm not sure that's a concern as long as the camper doesn't develop leaks. My current camper is a late 70's early 80's wood-frame Skamper and it's still holding together. I drive it on rough 4WD roads though I don't do hard-core 4WDing (i.e. not a lot of tilts and torques). My understanding is that wood campers sweat less and are warmer since they don't conduct the cold as readily.
So at the risk of attracting the indignation of he FWC (and ATC) communities, I will ask if those campers are really as superior as most comments suggest?
The Northstar MC600 has a dry weight of 1148 lbs which INCLUDES the jacks, 3-way frig, 16k Btu furnace, power converter, 20# propane tank, Fantastic fan, fire extinguisher, etc. The Northstar also includes underbed storage which is SO nice.
Here's what I get when I add everything up for the comparable FWC Fleet:
Shell - 845 lbs
Auxiliary battery system - 53
FanTastic Fan - 8
Interior lights - 3
Furnace - 25 (not sure how many Btu)
Steel Jack Brackets - 4
Camper jacks - 100
2 cu ft 3-way frig - 40
Total = 1078
That's a difference in weight of "only" 70 lbs. The one comparative I am not sure of, however, is the auxiliary battery system. I'm not quite sure what that is. If it includes a battery, then I have to subtract that from the Fleet total for a final difference of 123 lbs. That's not insignificant on a Tacoma, but not as big a difference as I expected given all the hype.
Obviously, you don't have to get all those things with a custom FWC build so you can lighten your load.
The Northstar is wood framed and the FWC is aluminum. Wood can obviously rot if exposed to moisture but in a dry climate like here in Colorado, I'm not sure that's a concern as long as the camper doesn't develop leaks. My current camper is a late 70's early 80's wood-frame Skamper and it's still holding together. I drive it on rough 4WD roads though I don't do hard-core 4WDing (i.e. not a lot of tilts and torques). My understanding is that wood campers sweat less and are warmer since they don't conduct the cold as readily.
So at the risk of attracting the indignation of he FWC (and ATC) communities, I will ask if those campers are really as superior as most comments suggest?