Any thoughts on ride quality of progressive vs digressive?
Truth. I believe the only advantage to digressive is that it probably prevents wallowing on pavement for a soft suspension while crawling. Whether that does the trick or not is the basis of pulling the pin on a discussion like this. For me a very major reason I wanted better suspension was the feeling that I was losing control on washboards at moderate speeds and going even softer valving as the shaft speed increases seemed to me to be the opposite of what I wanted. I can tell you OME and now FOX are both worlds better than stock shocks for that, but I've never had Icon to compare directly.You could rephrase that question to "King, fox, sway a way, blistein, radflo vs icon" since icon is the only company I know of that's claiming better offroad damping from digressive valving.
In an offroad application, with big sidewall tires that are aired down, I don't find enough of a difference.
Icons digressive valving allows it to be very mild on the street, however. but I still wouldn't buy their product, personally.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ive had them all on different vehicles, king, fox, sway a way, icon, ome.
King over everything, fox is a close second. Its worth it to pony up the money for them. If you end up not liking the ride, get them revalved. My truck rides like a cadillac.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Not going to be very "smooth riding"im prolly going to go with this kit
https://www.amazon.com/Bilstein-Spr...308&sr=8-2&keywords=2016+tacoma+bilstein+6112.
struts are already built for easy swaping. ill just use strut compressor at work here and install on lowest snap ring groove.