Search results

here is the article I was refering about montero sport/chrysler engine donar http://www.epinions.com/review/auto_Make-2000_Mitsubishi_Montero_Sport_4WD/content_121682169476 thx

if buying used Montero let's say 2006, how come ones knows what kind of trans fluid were used previously. just test driving would be enough?

what about 2003-2006 Montero full size, are they 100% japaneese parts and design? or do they share any trans/engine with any other company? I just find out the remaining power train doesn't not transferable, was thining to trade my 04 pilot with 2006 limited with 72K millege on it.

I read some where's on line that Montero sport's engine is actualy 3.0 liter same as chrusler engine with Japaness twist, that is why is it is not reliable, what about GEN 3 montero full size , do they have thier own engine and trans or it is borrowed from another Chrysler engine with little...

looks like this is Montero Sport not Montero ( 7 Pass) . I personally don't like Montero Sport.

well , I was suppose to see it tomorrow, however saler just email me that Montero is sold. Hunt continues.

Thx, both. I probbaly need to wait, last week I test drove 94 SR with 176K, no rust, everything seems to work, however interior needs , it needs two new front seat. no history record, I would imagine it needs belts and water pump soon. I offered him 1000 he didn't take it. some paint fading.

Hi, need you opinion regrading 1992 Montero LS, it is 155000, one owner, with service records. Also some surface rust on "skid plates" on undercarriage. nothing on body. from pics looks good inside and exterior. asking is 2200.

thx, for info, it is definetly SR. I test drove it yesterday, it runs fine and 4x4 seems to work, I pushed rear locker bottom , howver I am not sure wahtI have to see on dash board. Ower cliam he never used 4x4 or r/r either, I believed him, interior is in really bad shape, both front seat was...

what did you end up buying?

I am looking at 1994 Montero SR with 175K on it, no history record, however current owner saying he bought from dealer 7 years ago, paint fading on hood, and front seat needs to be covered. no rust or leak, asking price is 2K, been on sale for quit a while atleast 2 months, what you guys think ...

so let me ask you this since original discussion was for how much are you paying for FJ60, anf FJ62. I am in north east, and rust is major issue here as you all know, I am looking at another 1984 FJ60, has 135K on it, there are some body rust , not major, owner already changed cluch, timing...

so not worth considering? is there a database to find some one to look it if I find something in CA,etc,..?

My original post was also for 88 FJ62.It is in good shape ,and I am not seeing any rust atleast not from pics, he is asking 8500$ with 240K. my second 88 find is about 3 hrs from me, and has the rust issue I posted pics earlier. he is asking 3800, with 205K.( needs breaks pad too) according to...

it is 88 -FJ62. you are right I can't believe frame is solid either. he is asking 3800, nego.

most north east tucks are rusty, it is really hard to find one withought rust. I haven't seen the truck inperson, per saler frame is solid.!!! thx

take a look at attched file is that bad rust? per saler this all the rust ? 205000 on it. 88 LC

he is asking 8900. 240 K , it is florida truck, exterior and interior looks nice, it is blue. I just don't know about LC in general? do they have timing belt ? will you go for FJ60 or FJ62 since FJ60 is 3K cheaper?

Hi, all I am trying to find out what is the resonable price to pay for 1988 FJ62, this FL car and no rust, exterior and interior looks really good, has 240K miles on it. is there any site we can check what is worth for this kind of trucks? what should I look for when buying fj62.? thx

Thx, offroader. I got an oppurtunety to purchase 1997 LS , body and interior seems to be in good shape , however the owner put "STOPIT" in engine instead of radiator. aperently he had raditor leak. base on your info I don't think it is worth even putting used engine, or even overhaul it since...