17" Wheels - How I got them on my LR3

Mack73

Adventurer
There has been talk for years about being able to fit 17" wheels on the LR3. 17" wheels were never available in the US, but they were sold on LR3's in the UK/Europe and Australia.

I really wanted to get a set of 17's for 2 reasons: 1) Due to the welded on frame bit in the back of the front wheel well, a 32" wheel won't fit without some cutting and welding. and 2) I really don't like running a 32" wheel if the suspension fails. So I ended up with 265/65/18 BFG TA/KO. But what I really wanted was a true MT.

As luck would have it, a set of LR3 17" wheels came up for sale in the US.

The thought was all that needs to be done is convert the front brakes to v6 spec to clear the wheels. And this is true. The only difference from the v8 brakes are 1) The caliper carrier, and 2) the rotor. So a quick trip to Land Rover for a set of front carriers (Part # SEH500012) for about $120. Then a stop by Atlantic British for a v6 brake kit. Installation is super easy. You need to take the carriers off to change the rotor anyways, so the process is the same as changing the rotors, just put the new carriers on instead of the v8 ones.

New shinny v6 caliper carriers and rotors

image_1_zpsf2e2efa5.jpeg


Now for the problem.......... I tried to put the rear wheel on and found this:

image_zps464bed12.jpeg


I had never heard that the rear brakes were larger than in the UK/ROW vehicles that came with 17's........ Bugger. So what to do. I started grinding on the calipers to see if it would get better.. and it did, but it would not be safe to remove the amount of material necessary to get them to fit. Wheel spacers are the only answer.

I then got a set of 30mm Terrafirma wheel spacers.

image_2_zps09d51606.jpeg


Slapped those suckers on and........... still no good. It is very close but still touches the rim. So out comes the grinder and a flap wheel. A good amount of material needs to come off in several spots, but overall not 'that' much and 1) its the rear brakes and 2) they are way over built out of solid steel


image_3_zpscda4338b.jpeg


Since my rear brakes are brand new, the caliper is pushed out as far as possible. As the pads wear the caliper will move further in reducing the contact. Therefore the only way to get them to fit with v8 brakes is some grinding and 30mm spacers. I'm not happy about running the spacers offroad and the fact that it has pushed the wheels out too far (in my opinion) but it will be a good enough temp fix until I can research the correct rear brakes to fit.

And here they are. 245/75-17 BFGoodrich KM2 on Land Rover 17" wheels. Finally a true mud terrain in <32" and a GOOD sized side wall. And yes I like my pizza cutters

If anyone knows the part numbers for the smaller rear brakes please let me know.

Normal Height

image_7_zps658d1db9.jpeg


Off Road Height

image_6_zps77f6e476.jpeg

image_5_zps3c13c7de.jpeg

image_4_zpscea2bd70.jpeg
 

racehorse

Adventurer
As the pads wear the caliper will move further in reducing the contact. Therefore the only way to get them to fit with v8 brakes is some grinding and 30mm spacers. I'm not happy about running the spacers offroad and the fact that it has pushed the wheels out too far (in my opinion) but it will be a good enough temp fix until I can research the correct rear brakes to fit.

And here they are. 245/75-17 BFGoodrich KM2 on Land Rover 17" wheels. Finally a true mud terrain in <32" and a GOOD sized side wall. And yes I like my pizza cutters

If anyone knows the part numbers for the smaller rear brakes please let me know.

Normal Height

image_7_zps658d1db9.jpeg


Off Road Height

image_6_zps77f6e476.jpeg

image_5_zps3c13c7de.jpeg

image_4_zpscea2bd70.jpeg


Looks fantastic. My opinion 265-sized tyres/tires look great with spacers - the way they should. The tires (265) sit at the proper stance with spacers and look odd without them - as if they are sucked into the wheel wells too deeply.
 

454

Exploder
All that and you went with the white letters out. :sombrero:

Otherwise, I like the look of an MT with a decent sidewall.
 

brickpaul65

Adventurer
So spacers would not work with the original front brakes (similar to the Overland Journal LR4 transition to 18" from 19"?
 

Mack73

Adventurer
Well I figured out the source of my problem. There is a smaller rear brake rotor for the rear to fit 17's.

Rear Carrier part number: SXP500013

Carriers and Rotors on the way! Too bad I just bought new v8 rear discs..... oh well. Atleast I can reuse the pads as they only have 200 miles on them.

Who wants some very gently used Terrafirma spacers :p


Regarding the wheels fitting without the v6 brakes - I didn't test this, but my guess is no way.
 
Last edited:

Howski

Well-known member
Very cool. This opens up a lot of options for LR3 owners. Real like the design of those alloys too
 

94Discovery

Adventurer
By reducing the rotor to a smaller diameter aren't you reducing your braking power especially now you have bigger tires?
 

nwoods

Expedition Leader
By reducing the rotor to a smaller diameter aren't you reducing your braking power especially now you have bigger tires?

Certainly. But it's a bit like asking a Millipede if it is greatly encumbered if it looses a leg. The LR3/4 braking system is robust and oversized, designed as a capable tow rig. The fractional reduction in performance is negligible in all normal situations, and would really only make itself known in high-heat situations where brake fade could be noticeable. Sadly, I never got my LR3 onto the race track, so I never experienced that.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
186,725
Messages
2,887,513
Members
227,160
Latest member
roamingraven

Members online

Top