I hope we learn more in April and don't have to wait until '23-'24 -- this is officially on my list now, along with the Ineos and the Defender, but if it's not going to land for 2-3 more years...well I'm patient, but not THAT patient!
It will be interesting to see what this looks like. If the italics part is true (Not doubting you T-Willy, just not sure about the comments from the source) then that is fantastic news potentially, but it'll be interesting to see who they play this vehicle against in our market. I also share
@T-Willy 's concerns about payload and volume -- but the 200-series isn't exactly a payload beast -- it maxes out at about 1300 lbs. That's around half of what the 79-series will take, and it puts it on par with the JLU Sport.
More importantly, a 4x4 Toyota with decent but rugged interior appointments and a 1300 lbs payload already exists in North America - it's called the 4-Runner. And if you want a reliable Toyota with around 1300 lbs payload, but you don't like wagons, you have the Tacoma. So the question is, what can the Land Cruiser do that their existing lineup cannot (for adventure travellers/Overlanders, I mean, specifically). There are a few ways they can differentiate the Land Cruiser -- make the 4x4 options and data more direct and clear. Give it a proper wading depth, like the Jeep and Defender. Publish a roof load that considers the stuff people will put up there. But, doing that may actually cannibalize a lot of 4-runner and Tacoma sales, so it'll be interesting to see how this comes about.
Payload is actually a huge area for differentiation from their existing lineup -- I would love it if the payload numbers were up closer to 1700-1800 lbs. A REALLY nice touring rig can be built with 1300 lbs (bumpers, winches, tent, etc.) but it doesn't leave a ton of breathing room for families once it's built up. For couples or solo travellers though it's plenty.