I tried posting this question in a Dodge-specific forum, but got very little feedback there. Someone suggested I post it here, since it is an expedition-related question, so here I am, with my first post in this forum.
Would it be a good thing to put these tires on new steel rims from a 2014 2500 to be mounted on a stock 2003/early 2004 2500, or would the 285/75R17 Toyo ATs (on stock 2003/early 2004 steel wheels) be preferable?
The truck is a 4x4 with 3.73 gear ratio, the Cummins diesel engine and manual transmission, will not do any towing and will be used for long distance expedition travel, carrying a camper shell with sleeping/storage platform, various equipment and supplies, will weigh from 2,000 to 2,500 lbs. total, seeing 80% highway/city streets and 20% gravel roads.
I know that the 285/75R17s will fit no problem. And there's only a 2-lb difference between the two tires, the 285/75-17s are 63 lbs and the 285/75-18s 65 lbs. Not sure, though, about how the 2003/2004 2500 stock 17" steel rims compare in weight to the 2014 steel 18s.
Being the Toyo AT 285/75-18 a 35" tire (34.8" x 11.3" measured) with a weight rating of 4,080 lbs, while the same Toyo AT in 285/75-17 is 34" tall (33.8" x 11.3" measured) and with a weight rating of only 3,195 lbs, I'm thinking that there would be a lot to be gained in going for the taller tire (might even improve the mpg).
I'm just not sure, though, whether the 285/75-18s would work properly on a stock 2003/2004 2500 (I suspect they would) for the use I have in mind and if there are any considerations making the 285/75-17s a better choice.
What's your opinion and personal experience in this regard, and if you have pictures of these tires on 3rd gen 2500s, it would be great to see them here, too.
Would it be a good thing to put these tires on new steel rims from a 2014 2500 to be mounted on a stock 2003/early 2004 2500, or would the 285/75R17 Toyo ATs (on stock 2003/early 2004 steel wheels) be preferable?
The truck is a 4x4 with 3.73 gear ratio, the Cummins diesel engine and manual transmission, will not do any towing and will be used for long distance expedition travel, carrying a camper shell with sleeping/storage platform, various equipment and supplies, will weigh from 2,000 to 2,500 lbs. total, seeing 80% highway/city streets and 20% gravel roads.
I know that the 285/75R17s will fit no problem. And there's only a 2-lb difference between the two tires, the 285/75-17s are 63 lbs and the 285/75-18s 65 lbs. Not sure, though, about how the 2003/2004 2500 stock 17" steel rims compare in weight to the 2014 steel 18s.
Being the Toyo AT 285/75-18 a 35" tire (34.8" x 11.3" measured) with a weight rating of 4,080 lbs, while the same Toyo AT in 285/75-17 is 34" tall (33.8" x 11.3" measured) and with a weight rating of only 3,195 lbs, I'm thinking that there would be a lot to be gained in going for the taller tire (might even improve the mpg).
I'm just not sure, though, whether the 285/75-18s would work properly on a stock 2003/2004 2500 (I suspect they would) for the use I have in mind and if there are any considerations making the 285/75-17s a better choice.
What's your opinion and personal experience in this regard, and if you have pictures of these tires on 3rd gen 2500s, it would be great to see them here, too.