Hmmm - interesting, but yet he spends a bit too much time with hyperbole and generalization for my taste . . . it's not fair to lump all greenies in one group, just as it's not fair to characterize all 4x4 enthusiasts as bud-swilling morons.
He wrote:
"The more I think of it, the more I realize that the greenies are really not environmentalists at all....they are anti-recreationists. They threaten our land management agencies with law suits and they demand that access to our public lands be denied to the off-road community. There solution to the problem is to lock everyone out. I don't see them helping on the trail cleanups and I don't see them providing constructive input at the public land use meetings. From now on, I will not degrade the environmentalist label by applying it to the greenies. They do NOT deserve to be called such a thing."
Not fair at all. I have been very closely involved with many environmental groups, and I can think of one or two people - not whole groups - that want to see total lock out - it's just not true. Shutting down illegal roads? Yes. Totally shutting down public land? Not true. Not seeming to provide constructive input? Not always true. I see just as many off-roaders being non-constructive.
His main point (I think) is good, though: too much of a schizm between user groups.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.