tdesanto
Expedition Leader
bigreen505 said:As usual I'm a little late to the party here. I generally recommend Lightroom as a great solution for most people, but I personally don't like it as I find it generally lacking.
On the whole I am very impressed with CS4 and I have to say that this version of Bridge doesn't suck, or at least not as much as previous versions, and I have been using it for general DAM stuff.
What makes LR great is that it is an all in one ingest, metadata, process and DAM solution. However, I don't find it all that great at any of them though IMO it has the best and cleanest workflow. For raw conversion I much prefer the output of Capture One, though I don't love the interface or workflow it forces.
DAM is still an area I don't know where to go. I really liked iView3, but I don't have faith in Microsoft developing it further. I don't like the way that Adobe handles DAM, but I believe they are committed. Hence my dilemma.
To answer your question, I consider CS4 necessary and LR2 nice if you decide you want it. I'm pretty sure that anything you can do in LR you can do in CS4.
Yes, digital asset management (DAM) is still nebulous for me and my current workflow is simply slow and tedious to the point that I shoot a ton of images, but never get around to editing them, or just don’t want to spend the time it takes with my current setup. So, I’m hoping that Lightroom will help me in that arena and CS4 will give me the additional power that I want when I need it.