Z O O R O P A
Explorer
Just wondering, with more room than a 4runner and offered in a V6, the previous model looks like it would be a good rig for trail riding
Z O O R O P A said:Just wondering, with more room than a 4runner and offered in a V6, the previous model looks like it would be a good rig for trail riding
There is so much more room in a Sequoia than there is in a LC, even the first generation Sequoia. Aside from a slightly longer wheelbase, width and weight, the Sequoia should be able to accomplish anything the cruiser would stock. Almost all the bells and whistles for the front suspension of Tundras can be used on Sequoias. The back has a different suspension, though.Martinjmpr said:As far as expo travel is concerned, though, there's nothing that the Sequoia can do that the LC can't do better. And the prices are close enough that anybody who really wants an expedition-ready Toyota is more likely to go with the LC than the Sequoia because there is so much better aftermarket.
RoundOut said:There is so much more room in a Sequoia than there is in a LC, even the first generation Sequoia. Aside from a slightly longer wheelbase, width and weight, the Sequoia should be able to accomplish anything the cruiser would stock. Almost all the bells and whistles for the front suspension of Tundras can be used on Sequoias. The back has a different suspension, though.
I would suggest that the Sequoia could be used as a vehicle for longer term expeditions than the LC, other things equal.
I have both a 2003 Tundra and a 2003 Sequoia. The Sequoia is by far the finest vehicle I have ever owned.
.
Martinjmpr said:Bigger is not always a plus, though. And the new (07+) Sequoia's are huge!
The OP asked why there weren't a lot of Seqouia builds, I think it is for the same reason there aren't a lot of Suburban or Tahoe builds - because the people who buy Suburbans or Tahoes are not people who are usually interested in building an expo-type rig.
I would say the same for the Seqouia - the people who buy them are usually buying them because they are a big people-mover and a comfortable towing rig.
Another factor is availability of parts outside the US. The LC is sold worldwide - AFAIK the Sequoia/Tundra are specifically marketed to the US and Canada. Are they even sold anywhere else?
I understand that you may be the exception to the rule, but that doesn't invalidate the rule.
dieselcruiserhead said:I forget the link but there is a Tundra and Sequoia expedition travelling around the world as we speak. They have a "why a Sequoia and why not a land cruiser" FAQ and they say because of parts interchangability and a number of other reasons... it was sponsored by a Denver Toyota dealer, if it helps...
I bought the Backstopper "CA-5005.U" Reverse Parking Sensor. I got them for just a bit over $50 on Amazon.com. On both my wife's and mine, I purchased the kind that mounts under the dash, and suspended them near the rear view mirror, so one would not have to look in more than one place while backing up blind.Cackalak Han said:OT: RoundOut - Which back up sensors did you end up going with? Thinking of putting it in my wife's rig, too.
Another factor is availability of parts outside the US. The LC is sold worldwide - AFAIK the Sequoia/Tundra are specifically marketed to the US and Canada. Are they even sold anywhere else? [/QUOTE said:There was an article last week in automotive news that they are starting to export both the Sequoia and possibly the Tundra to Central American, Asia, Russia and the Middle East. They are pretty confident that they can still sell sufficient numbers in those markets to offset some of the loss they are getting here in the states.