Ray_G
Explorer
Glad I found this thread. I will likely be in the market in a month or so for a truck and in my price range are LR3's and 1st gen sequoias. Love Toyota but always wanted a Rover product and from the research i've done the LR3 is a reliable design, which seems to be confirmed by this thread. I have a 2nd gen 4Runner for my toyota fix, but I know the Sequoias are low maintenance. It sounds like everyone is doing ball joints, control arms, brakes and tires every 30k. Is this the consensus? Other than that it doesn't sound like they are a headache. I can turn my own wrenches so i'm not as concerned about these items, I just don't want to have to drop $10k a year in repairs. Not expecting Toyota prices but I don't want to go broke driving it.
So what I've found owning both an LR3 and a Toyota Tacoma is that the Toyota is low maint-and thus cheap. Till it isn't. Then it is far from cheap.
The LR3 is relatively low maint, for a Rover especially so, so long as maintained as this thread highlights.
Not sure that you'll be doing all the things you mention every 30k. My control arms lasted longer than that, tires too (BFGs have, Nittos did not). Brakes, yeah you will be changing pads out but that's easy.
More importantly, as you note-if you can turn the wrench a lot of cost goes down.
r-
Ray