I'd really like to know how much of this article (linked earlier):
http://www.plasmarope.com.au/plasma-vs-dyneema.html is marketing hype and how much is true:
"During the course of a research program into the life of ropes in towage operations in the US, it was discovered that ropes made from Dyneema can suffer from drum compression damage, that is damage caused to the rope while it is stored on the winch drum. This is basically a fatigue mechanism that sees the rope strength degrade over time from being stored on a winch drum. This would appear to diminish the effectiveness of these types of ropes in 4x4 winching applications. Compression testing results indicate that Plasma would have a 30% longer life in these sorts of applications."
The article also seems to indicate that Plasma/Spectra has better internal abrasion resistance than Dyneema/Amsteel Blue. If the UV resistance and other factors are essentially the same between the two, it would appear that Plasma is the better choice than Dyneema.
Anyone have any more data on plasma/spectra vs dyneema?
Technora/Aramid is now out of the picture due to the bending fatigue/sheeve diameter and lack of UV resistance. I still don't like the temperature fatigue ratings on the HMPE types, but I can mitigate temperature increases, I can't mitigate the size of the winch drum or the shining of the sun.