mrbishi said:Salt Water Fly Fishing - Broome, Western Australia
mrbishi said:
mrbishi said:Windmill - Ninghan Station, Western Australia
The Cove - Cottesloe, Western Australia
Salt Water Fly Fishing - Broome, Western Australia
Get your boots off that map, didn't your mother teach you anything? LOLPhotog said:I have not tossed anything in here in a while.
I agree, this shot screems stock. Very nice guys!mrbishi said:Salt Water Fly Fishing - Broome, Western Australia
mrbishi said:I'd love to submit some images to stock photography websites but have no idea where to start - any tips/advice?
You are very talented, these are great shots!mrbishi said:Here are a few more for you to enjoy.
Manarie - Cape Leveque, Western Australia
Salt Water Fly Fishing - Broome, Western Australia
Cape Keraudren, Western Australia
Star Trails - Dwellingup, Western Australia
Lost Canadian said:Heavy subject, we should probably start a new thread if people take notice and want to talk more about it, but having just started this whole process myself let me offer this up here and now.
First step is finding one you like. Some of the better ones are, Corbis, Getty, Alamy, Jupiter Images, Aurora Photos, Masterfile, Digital Railroad and Marketplace.
Be prepared to go through your images and only select the 'cream of the crop'. Also make sure the file size is about 50 meg's or larger, as the requirement to go to print is indeed a marketplace for these firms. Make sure all of the spotting and adjustments have been made, take them up to 100% and see if there are spotting problems or noise issues. Dont over sharpen anything - as they will ususally do the final tweeks.
You'll probabaly need about 50 or more images to submit depending on the stock agency. They will review your 'style' and the content of what you shoot. Some will also require an annual submission number, so they continue to get good stuff from you.
You could also use a microstock agency, there are tons of these. Most working pros though are critical of these and see them as "killing the buisness." The difference is that micro agencies typically specialize in royalty-free, low cost photos and traditional agencies specialize in high cost, rights-managed photos. If you want to make some money the micro agencies are almost a waste of time. For instance they might charge as low as $1 for an image with somewhere between 20 and 50% going to the photographer. So to make $100 in commissions with micro agencies, you`ll have to sell a lot of images. Almost a waste of time considering the amount of time and effort that has to go into preparing and tagging photos for these agencies.
If you`re really serious about selling some images pick up Richard Weisgrau and Victor Perlman's book "Photography Licensing". It`ll give you a ton of info about the business of photography and licensing.
Most importantly shoot the good stuff, submit often, and be patient.....as things typically won't happen until you've got a lot of material out there.
Perhaps PM some of the pro's here as well. Sinuhe, and Michael Slade are but a couple of the talented pros here that may have more insight.
Lost Canadian said:Heavy subject, we should probably start a new thread if people take notice and want to talk more about it, but having just started this whole process myself let me offer this up here and now.
First step is finding one you like. Some of the better ones are, Corbis, Getty, Alamy, Jupiter Images, Aurora Photos, Masterfile, Digital Railroad and Marketplace.
Be prepared to go through your images and only select the 'cream of the crop'. Also make sure the file size is about 50 meg's or larger, as the requirement to go to print is indeed a marketplace for these firms. Make sure all of the spotting and adjustments have been made, take them up to 100% and see if there are spotting problems or noise issues. Dont over sharpen anything - as they will ususally do the final tweeks.
You'll probabaly need about 50 or more images to submit depending on the stock agency. They will review your 'style' and the content of what you shoot. Some will also require an annual submission number, so they continue to get good stuff from you.
You could also use a microstock agency, there are tons of these. Most working pros though are critical of these and see them as "killing the buisness." The difference is that micro agencies typically specialize in royalty-free, low cost photos and traditional agencies specialize in high cost, rights-managed photos. If you want to make some money the micro agencies are almost a waste of time. For instance they might charge as low as $1 for an image with somewhere between 20 and 50% going to the photographer. So to make $100 in commissions with micro agencies, you`ll have to sell a lot of images. Almost a waste of time considering the amount of time and effort that has to go into preparing and tagging photos for these agencies.
If you`re really serious about selling some images pick up Richard Weisgrau and Victor Perlman's book "Photography Licensing". It`ll give you a ton of info about the business of photography and licensing.
Most importantly shoot the good stuff, submit often, and be patient.....as things typically won't happen until you've got a lot of material out there.
Perhaps PM some of the pro's here as well. Sinuhe, and Michael Slade are but a couple of the talented pros here that may have more insight.
Scenic WonderRunner said:San Diego.......
Moon Sun Reflection Old New........Future (far right!).
Oh! ....and seagull........diggin' it! Look close!
.