Oh I get it, so the regime in iran saw their blog then said great, we will arrest these westerners for no good reason and use them as leverage to get our guy back, then the regime used the blog to track them so they could be arrested, brilliant!!.... such planning from a third world government!The wouldn’t have needed to look real hard for them.... would of known they’d entered the country when they crossed the border, and i doubt there’s many Troopies driving around Iran with surfboards strapped to the roof of them....they would have stuck out like dogs balls
The story didn’t change.So now the story changed some but still no one here knows the real truth of exactly what happened you're ASSuming that everyone else here is wrong and they did nothing wrong? in an exchange plan and stumbled onto these bloggers by accident.
If you remember the initial reports on the news said they were arrested for flying a drone without a permit, that isn't an assumption, that's what was reported.... but you are correct, you are such the perfect human and I am not, so keep sitting their in your pious chair with your holier than thou attitude.The story didn’t change.
You and other made assumptions and conclusions..based on what?
I waited for some info until i made a claim about anything and not judging them before we had any clue of what happened.
And now, when it revealed that they were only play cards in a political issue, you only climb higher on the tree.. I wish you only good luck.
Again.. No.If you remember the initial reports on the news said they were arrested for flying a drone without a permit, that isn't an assumption,.
should we disbelieve the news???. well..... yeah pretty much you got to disbelieve their spin.... you got to dig thru the various stories to find as best you can some consistency of specifics to interpolate the most probable fact.....That's a quote from the news, so do you disbelieve the news? Are we supposed to ignore the news reports until a story has been repeated a certain number of times?...
Not the point I was trying to make, when multiple news outlets say the same thing over and over it usually ends up being true, and the dude doing all the moaning and hand wringing about these bloggers said :should we disbelieve the news???. well..... yeah pretty much you got to disbelieve their spin.... you got to dig thru the various stories to find as best you can some consistency of specifics to interpolate the most probable fact.
So he was wrong or misguided, either way the news reported it as they broke a crime and he expects us all to cry and moan about the poor lil bloggers, nope.Again.. No.
The initial reports said “maybe”, “could be”, and “not certain”.. and concluded responsibly with “no further details at this time”
News evolve, this is why it’s called “initial”, and this is why it’s ”allegedly “ until certainty, so there is a gap for error.So the news is wrong now? Initial reports
Ah Bobby! He was just a professional, doing his job.reportedly
adv.
By report; supposedly.
adv.
according to reports or other information