With regards to this thread I got curious, so I did some testing.
I did this years ago to verify my method works, but this thread had even be doubting it.
Test as follows...
Found an old battery cable in the shop. So I lopped one end off of it, and found the correct lug in my electrical drawer.
I think it is a 1/0 cable. Not sure, doesnt really matter.
For the sake of the test, I did as MOST probably would, not knowing any better.
Zero prep. No wire wheel, no flux, no nothing.
here we go...
With lug in the vise, I stripped the cable and test fit.
Satisfied with the fit, I loaded the lug with some solder and added heat.
This continued until the lug was about 3/4 full, and completely molten.
Then the cable was inserted, heat applied for a few more seconds, then heat removed and assembly allowed to cool.
Interested in how the solder interacted with the strands, I pulled hard on the insulator to see.
Its hard to see in the photo, but the solder was bonded to the strands, and looked to go pretty deep into the cable.
After everything was cooled the connector was crimped, using nothing more than a "hammer" type crimper.
I find they work very well with large conductors.
Now, this is where I would normally install the adhesive heat shrink, but instead I cut the joint apart for inspection.
Right at the end of the lug, just about where the conductors ended.
Even though everything is coated in solder, the voids remain. This is why many will drill a small hole into the lug, to allow the solder to flow into this portion.
Although, with the conductor ending right here, I see no harm in not having solder.
Then I cut right thru the crimp joint.
This is what I referred to as "cold welded"
The copper strands, solder, and copper lug are literally 1-piece due to the compression of the crimp.
Then I cut right near the entrance of the lug.
Same story. 100% void free and cold welded.
Thoughts??
I still fail to see the reason to NOT utilize this method.