Robert Bills
Explorer
Ok, I’ve over-analyzed my choice of antennas to the point of paralysis. :drool:
Please help me choose which one of these two dual band antennas for my Yaesu FT-90R. I need to get this done.
Comet SS-460SB NMO 18” closed coil with spring, black [$43.95]
Published specs:
146MHz 1/4 wave 2.15dBi
446MHz 5/8 wave 3.8dBi
VSWR: 1.5:1 or less
Max Power: 60W
Length: 18"
Connector: NMO
Larsen NMO-2/70SH 19” closed coil with spring, stainless whip [$49.95]
Published Specs:
VHF: ¼ wave 2.14 dBi
UHF: ¾ wave 4 dBi
VSWR: 1.5:1 (see below)
Max Power: 200W
Length: 19”
Connector: NMO
Also: “BANDWIDTH @ 1.5 VHF: 10% / UHF: 10% BANDWIDTH @ 2.0 VHF: 15% / UHF: 17% COIL VHF: 146 MHz / UHF: 445 MHz . . . Black/Stainless WHIP .100 enclosed coil . . . .”
These antennas appear to be of nearly identical height and rated performance at approximately the same price. However, the additional information provided for the Larsen NMO 2/70SH regarding bandwidth (which I do not pretend to understand), and its greater power capacity, makes me wonder whether the Larsen might have greater bandwidth than the Comet or be a superior product.
Does anyone know if there is much or any real world difference between the two? Experience with either or both?
If the Larsen is “better” for an offroading appliance operator like me, who sometimes tries to listen to frequencies at the edges of the bands but for the most part use my radio to listen to the real Hams and for trail communications, then the Larsen is the antenna I will buy. If however, they work the same and are built the same, I am leaning toward the Comet if for no other reason than it is black and won’t glint in the sun or be as noticeable as a stainless whip.
Thanks for the help.
Please help me choose which one of these two dual band antennas for my Yaesu FT-90R. I need to get this done.
Comet SS-460SB NMO 18” closed coil with spring, black [$43.95]
Published specs:
146MHz 1/4 wave 2.15dBi
446MHz 5/8 wave 3.8dBi
VSWR: 1.5:1 or less
Max Power: 60W
Length: 18"
Connector: NMO
Larsen NMO-2/70SH 19” closed coil with spring, stainless whip [$49.95]
Published Specs:
VHF: ¼ wave 2.14 dBi
UHF: ¾ wave 4 dBi
VSWR: 1.5:1 (see below)
Max Power: 200W
Length: 19”
Connector: NMO
Also: “BANDWIDTH @ 1.5 VHF: 10% / UHF: 10% BANDWIDTH @ 2.0 VHF: 15% / UHF: 17% COIL VHF: 146 MHz / UHF: 445 MHz . . . Black/Stainless WHIP .100 enclosed coil . . . .”
These antennas appear to be of nearly identical height and rated performance at approximately the same price. However, the additional information provided for the Larsen NMO 2/70SH regarding bandwidth (which I do not pretend to understand), and its greater power capacity, makes me wonder whether the Larsen might have greater bandwidth than the Comet or be a superior product.
Does anyone know if there is much or any real world difference between the two? Experience with either or both?
If the Larsen is “better” for an offroading appliance operator like me, who sometimes tries to listen to frequencies at the edges of the bands but for the most part use my radio to listen to the real Hams and for trail communications, then the Larsen is the antenna I will buy. If however, they work the same and are built the same, I am leaning toward the Comet if for no other reason than it is black and won’t glint in the sun or be as noticeable as a stainless whip.
Thanks for the help.